Quality of Research Practice - An interdisciplinary face validity evaluation of a quality model
Autor: | Uno Fors, Emelie Fröberg, Gunnar Nilsson, Udo Zander, Pär Mårtensson |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Male
Questionnaires Sociology of scientific knowledge Research Validity Epidemiology Economics Research Quality Assessment Social Sciences Interdisciplinary Studies Multidisciplinary approach Surveys and Questionnaires Epidemiological Statistics Medicine and Health Sciences Research quality media_common Multidisciplinary 05 social sciences 050301 education Survey research Middle Aged Research Assessment Quality Improvement Research Personnel Research Design Epidemiological Methods and Statistics Medicine Female Psychology Research Article Universities Science Policy media_common.quotation_subject Science MEDLINE Research and Analysis Methods Research Funding Health Economics 0502 economics and business Humans Quality (business) Face validity Medical education Health economics Survey Research Reproducibility of Results Health Care 0503 education 050203 business & management |
Zdroj: | PLoS ONE, Vol 14, Iss 2, p e0211636 (2019) PLoS ONE |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 |
Popis: | There are few acknowledged multidisciplinary quality standards for research practice and evaluation. This study evaluates the face validity of a recently developed comprehensive quality model that includes 32 defined concepts based on four main areas (credible, contributory, communicable, and conforming) describing indicators of research practice quality. Responses from 42 senior researchers working within 18 different departments at three major universities showed that the research quality model was–overall–valid. The vast majority believed all concepts in the model to be important, and did not indicate the need for further development. However, some of the sub-concepts were indicated as being slightly less important. Further, there were significant differences concerning ‘communicable’ between disciplines and academic levels, and for ‘conforming’ between genders. Our study indicates that the research quality model proposes the opportunity to move to a more systematic and multidisciplinary approach to research quality improvement, which has implications for how scientific knowledge is obtained. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |