Prevalence of ESβL, AmpC and Colistin-Resistant E. coli in Meat: A Comparison between Pork and Wild Boar

Autor: Alice Vismarra, Ilaria Carmosino, Martina Rega, C. Bacci, Viviana Frascolla, Paolo Bonilauri
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2021
Předmět:
Zdroj: Microorganisms
Volume 9
Issue 2
Microorganisms, Vol 9, Iss 214, p 214 (2021)
ISSN: 2076-2607
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9020214
Popis: A global increase in Escherichia coli (E. coli) resistant to cephalosporins (extended-spectrum &beta
lactamases (ES&beta
Ls) and AmpC &beta
lactamases) has been recorded in the last 20 years. Similarly, several studies have reported the spread of colistin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae isolated from food and the environment. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence of ES&beta
L, AmpC and colistin-resistant E. coli isolated from pork and wild boar meat products in the Emilia Romagna region (North Italy). The isolates were analysed phenotypically (considering both resistant and intermediate profiles) and genotypically. The prevalence of genotypically confirmed ES&beta
L and AmpC E. coli was higher in pork meat products (ES&beta
L = 11.1% vs. AmpC = 0.3%) compared to wild boar meat (ES&beta
L = 6.5% vs. AmpC = 0%). Intermediate profiles for cefotaxime (CTX) and ceftazidime (CAZ) were genotypically confirmed as ES&beta
L in pork meat isolates but not for wild boar. Four E. coli from wild boar meat were resistant to colistin but did not harbour the mcr-1 gene. E. coli isolated from wild boar meat seem to show aspecific antimicrobial resistance mechanisms for cephalosporins and colistin. The prevalence of resistant isolates found in wild boar is less alarming than in pork from farmed domestic pigs. However, the potential risk to consumers of these meat products will require further investigations.
Databáze: OpenAIRE