US clinicians' perspectives on how mifepristone regulations affect access to medication abortion and early pregnancy loss care in primary care
| Autor: | Roya Yavari, Silpa Srinivasulu, Susan E. Rubin, Laura Riker, Libby Brubaker, Linda Prine |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Early Pregnancy Loss Exploratory research Qualitative property Abortion Affect (psychology) Health Services Accessibility Miscarriage 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Pregnancy medicine Humans 030212 general & internal medicine 030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine Primary Health Care business.industry Obstetrics and Gynecology Abortion Induced Mifepristone medicine.disease United States Abortion Spontaneous Reproductive Medicine Family medicine Female Thematic analysis business medicine.drug |
| Zdroj: | Contraception. 104(1) |
| ISSN: | 1879-0518 |
| Popis: | Objective Protocols including mifepristone are the most effective medication regimens for medication abortion and early pregnancy loss (EPL) management. Both can be safely and effectively offered in primary care settings. Despite mifepristone's excellent safety record, the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) heavily regulates provision. This exploratory study examines US primary care clinicians’ perspectives on the effects of mifepristone restrictions, including FDA regulations, on access to medication abortion and EPL management in primary care. Study Design In 2019, we conducted an online qualitative survey of US primary care clinicians recruited from six reproductive health-focused listservs. Open-ended questions queried about barriers to providing mifepristone and effects on patients when unable to access mifepristone in primary care. We iteratively coded and analyzed qualitative data using inductive thematic analysis. Results Of our analytic sample of 113 respondents, one-third had mifepristone available in their current primary practice setting. Key barriers to provision stemmed from the FDA rule to stock and dispense mifepristone onsite, including logistical difficulties and resistance from health center leadership. Clinicians believed that lack of mifepristone in primary care resulted in negative patient experiences, including disrupted continuity of care, medically-unnecessary appointments, and undesired aspiration procedures. Conclusions FDA regulations that inhibit mifepristone provision in primary care create structural barriers to provision. This may result in physical, emotional, and financial burdens for patients. Implications When mifepristone is unavailable in primary care, some patients in need of abortion or EPL care may experience physical, emotional, and financial harms. Removing FDA restrictions is a critical step in reducing primary care barriers to mifepristone provision and improving access to timely, patient-centered medication abortion and EPL care. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect