IMPROVE, a community-based exercise intervention versus support group to improve functional and health outcomes among older African American and Non-Hispanic White breast cancer survivors from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds: Recruitment strategies and baseline characteristics
| Autor: | Seunghee Margevicius, Caitlin Nagy, Halle C. F. Moore, Kristina Austin, Paul Hergenroeder, Monica Webb Hooper, Leonard Wimbley, Vanessa Feuntes, Mark D. Schluchter, Sarah Coccia, Kathryn H. Schmitz, Stephen Cerne, Elizabeth Bennet, Cynthia Owusu, Jean Petkac, Nora L. Nock, Nathan A. Berger |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Cancer Research
medicine.medical_specialty Randomization medicine.medical_treatment Breast Neoplasms Support group White People law.invention 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Breast cancer Randomized controlled trial Cancer Survivors law Internal medicine Outcome Assessment Health Care Medicine Humans 030212 general & internal medicine Community Health Services Personnel Selection Socioeconomic status Aged African american Aged 80 and over Exercise intervention business.industry medicine.disease Exercise Therapy Black or African American Self-Help Groups Oncology Socioeconomic Factors 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Cohort Female business |
| Zdroj: | CancerReferences. 127(11) |
| ISSN: | 1097-0142 |
| Popis: | BACKGROUND Behavioral intervention studies in older breast cancer survivors, particularly older African American (AA) and socioeconomic status-disadvantaged breast cancer survivors, are lacking. To inform future studies, the authors examined recruitment strategies in older breast cancer survivors who participated in an exercise intervention study. METHODS IMPROVE is a randomized trial designed to evaluate a group-based exercise intervention versus a support group (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02763228). Participants were aged ≥65 years who had survived stage I through III breast cancer and were within 5 years of treatment completion. Participants were recruited through multiple approaches, including peripheral, linguistic, and constituent-involving strategies that incorporated the identification of potentially eligible patients from 3 local hospitals and from State of Ohio registries and through direct clinician and community organization referrals. RESULTS Between October 2016 and November 2019, 7487 patients were screened, 4790 were potentially eligible, and 213 were randomized into the study. The eligible:randomization rates were 4.4% overall and 84%, 8%, and 2% for recruitment using direct referrals, hospital registries, and state registries, respectively. The median age of the randomized cohort was 70 years (range, 65-88 years) and included 44% AA and 44% socioeconomic status-disadvantaged breast cancer survivors. Compared with all registry-eligible patients, directly referred-eligible patients were more likely to be AA versus Non-Hispanic White (41% vs 19%; P = .006), to be contacted successfully (100% vs 33%; P < .0001), and to accept study participation (88% vs 16%; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS Direct referrals appeared to be the most efficient strategy for recruiting AA survivors. Behavioral intervention studies seeking to target older AA and socioeconomic status-disadvantaged breast cancer survivors should include strategies that foster direct referrals to study participation. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text