First experience with multiple mini interview for medical school admission in Brazil: Does it work in a different cultural scenario?
Autor: | Claudio Schvartsman, Thomaz Bittencourt Couto, Joyce Kelly Silva Barreto, Simone Cristina Azevedo B. S. Silva, Mariana Fachini Granato, Durval Anibal Daniel-Filho, Alexandre Holthausen Campos, Angela Tavares Paes, Julio C. Martins Monte, Eduardo Juan Troster, Elda Maria Stafuzza Gonçalves Pires |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: |
education.field_of_study
Medical education Rasch model 020205 medical informatics Population Medical school Reproducibility of Results 02 engineering and technology General Medicine Education Interviews as Topic 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine 0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering Humans School Admission Criteria 030212 general & internal medicine Students Psychology education Social psychology Brazil Schools Medical Reliability (statistics) |
Zdroj: | Medical Teacher. 39:1033-1039 |
ISSN: | 1466-187X 0142-159X |
Popis: | Evaluation of non-cognitive skills never has been used in Brazil. This study aims to evaluate Multiple Mini Interviews (MMI) in the admission process of a School of Medicine in São Paulo, Brazil.The population of the study comprised 240 applicants summoned for the interviews, and 96 raters. MMI contributed to 25% of the applicants' final grade. Eight scenarios were created with the aim of evaluating different non-cognitive skills, each one had two raters. At the end of the interviews, the applicants and raters described their impressions about MMI. The reliability of the MMI was analyzed using the Theory of Generalization and Many-Facet Rasch Model (MFRM).The G-study showed that the general reliability of the process was satisfactory (coefficient G = 0.743). The MMI grades were not affected by the raters' profile, time of interview (p = 0.715), and randomization group (p = 0.353). The Rasch analysis showed that there was no misfitting effects or inconsistent stations or raters. A significant majority of the applicants (98%) and all the raters believed MMIs were important in selecting students with a more adequate profile to study medicine.The general reliability of the selection process was excellent, and it was fully accepted by the applicants and raters. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |