Type and time of first re-intervention of posterior restorations – 13-year scenario at the public dental service
| Autor: | Miira M. Vehkalahti, Ulla-Riikka Palotie |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, HUS Head and Neck Center, Faculty of Medicine, Clinicum |
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male SELECTION Dental Restoration Failure Amalgam Public Dental Service ENGLAND Dentistry FAILED RESTORATIONS Dental Caries engineering.material Composite Resins Dental Amalgam TEETH 03 medical and health sciences re-intervention AGE 0302 clinical medicine stomatognathic system Electronic Health Records Humans Medicine composite LONGEVITY Dental Restoration Permanent General Dentistry Finland Retrospective Studies Service (business) business.industry AMALGAM RESTORATIONS 030206 dentistry General Medicine 313 Dentistry REPLACEMENT Amalgam (dentistry) stomatognathic diseases COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS PLACEMENT Posterior teeth engineering Female dental restoration failure business Tooth Re intervention 030217 neurology & neurosurgery |
| Zdroj: | Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 78:370-376 |
| ISSN: | 1502-3850 0001-6357 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/00016357.2020.1728378 |
| Popis: | Objectives: We investigated the first re-interventions of two- and three-surface direct restorations on posterior teeth, specifically noting the type and time of the first re-intervention. Materials and methods: In 2002, altogether 5542 posterior two- and three-surface composite and amalgam restorations were done for 3051 patients aged 25-30 years at Helsinki City Public Dental Service (PDS). Based on electronic patient records, we analysed all restorations (n = 2445) having re-intervention during a 13-year follow-up. We recorded the type of tooth, restoration size, and type of first re-intervention. The time to re-intervention was the interval between the date of the placement of restoration at the year 2002 and its first re-intervention. Results: Restorative treatment was the most common (77.9%) first re-intervention, followed by endodontics (11.5%), extractions (5.2%), and other (5.4%). Males, more frequently than females, had extraction or endodontics as first re-intervention. The average time to re-intervention was 5.7 years (SD 3.8; median 5.2). Both median and mean times were shortest for cases involving endodontics or extractions. Conclusions: For the majority of two- and three-surface posterior restorations, the first re-intervention is restorative (replacement or repair of restoration). The shortest time to re-intervention is for restorations that have endodontics or extraction as the first re-intervention. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|