Adverse events associated with umbilical catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Autor: | Kim Gibson, Adrian Esterman, Rebecca Sharp, Tricia Kleidon, Scott Morris, Amanda J. Ullman |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Gibson, Kim, Sharp, Rebecca, Ullman, Amanda, Morris, Scott, Kleidon, Tricia, Esterman, Adrian |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
education.field_of_study
business.industry Incidence (epidemiology) Population MEDLINE Obstetrics and Gynecology umbilical arterial catheters (UACs) law.invention Catheter Randomized controlled trial umbilical catheters law umbilical venous catheters (UVCs) Anesthesia Meta-analysis Pediatrics Perinatology and Child Health Medicine adverse events (AEs) Observational study education business Adverse effect |
Popis: | Objective: To determine the incidence of adverse events (AEs) associated with umbilical catheters in the neonatal population. Study design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials published between 2010 and 2020. Results: In total 14,226 umbilical venous catheters (UVCs) and 4228 umbilical arterial catheters (UACs) were included. Overall, 13.4% of UVCs were associated with an AE (95% CI: 10.1-17.0) or 2.4 per 1000 catheter days (95% CI: 1.8-3.0). UACs had an AE rate of 9% (95% CI: 5.9-12.8) or 0.87 per 1000 catheter days (95% CI: 0.4-1.3). UVC malposition was the most common (41.7% [95% CI: 27.6-56.5]). Local injury from UAC taping was the most common AE in one study. Conclusions: Umbilical catheters have a high incidence of AEs. Research into accurate methods of tip verification, tip surveillance, and securement is required. Refereed/Peer-reviewed |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |