A modeler's manifesto: Synthesizing modeling best practices with social science frameworks to support critical approaches to data science
Autor: | M. V. Eitzel |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Manifesto
Decision support system decision support mixed methods Computer science science and technology studies Best practice Science Big data triangulation Participatory modeling data biography reproducibility crisis critical theory big data quantitative-qualitative analysis citizen science Citizen science algorithmic injustice qualitative analysis critical data science History of science high variety big data reproducibility community-based participatory research legal participatory modeling quantitative analysis situated knowledge business.industry epistemology General Medicine community and citizen science science and justice Data science ethical data justice machine learning history of science Critical theory high volume big data interdisciplinary and social implications data science business |
Zdroj: | Research Ideas and Outcomes, Vol 7, Iss, Pp 1-29 (2021) |
Popis: | In the face of the "crisis of reproducibility" and the rise of "big data" with its associated issues, modeling needs to be practiced more critically and less automatically. Many modelers are discussing better modeling practices, but to address questions about the transparency, equity, and relevance of modeling, we also need the theoretical grounding of social science and the tools of critical theory. I have therefore synthesized recent work by modelers on better practices for modeling with social science literature (especially feminist science and technology studies) to offer a "modeler’s manifesto": a set of applied practices and framings for critical modeling approaches. Broadly, these practices involve 1) giving greater context to scientific modeling through extended methods sections, appendices, and companion articles, clarifying quantitative and qualitative reasoning and process; 2) greater collaboration in scientific modeling via triangulation with different data sources, gaining feedback from interdisciplinary teams, and viewing uncertainty as openness and invitation for dialogue; and 3) directly engaging with justice and ethics by watching for and mitigating unequal power dynamics in projects, facing the impacts and implications of the work throughout the process rather than only afterwards, and seeking opportunities to collaborate directly with people impacted by the modeling. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |