Consistency checks to improve measurement with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
| Autor: | Felice Ockun, Christian Yavorsky, Joyce Tsai, Atul R. Mahableshwarkar, Gretchen Friedberger, Janet B. W. Williams, Colin L. Sauder, Brianne Brown, Jonathan Rabinowitz, Bruce J Kinon, Mads Dalsgaard, Nina R. Schooler, Isctm Algorithms, Daniel Lee, Nina Engelhardt |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male endocrine system diseases Psychometrics environment and public health 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Consistency (negotiation) Rating scale Humans Reliability (statistics) Psychiatric Status Rating Scales Depression FLAGS register food and beverages Reproducibility of Results Middle Aged 030227 psychiatry Clinical trial Psychiatry and Mental health Clinical Psychology Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale Female Psychology 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Clinical psychology |
| Zdroj: | Journal of affective disorders. 256 |
| ISSN: | 1573-2517 |
| Popis: | International Society for CNS Clinical Trials and Methodology convened an expert Working Group that assembled consistency/inconsistency flags for the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Twenty-two flags were identified. Seven flags are believed to be strong flags that suggest that a thorough review of rating is warranted. The flags were applied to assessments derived from the NEWMEDS data repository. Almost 65% of ratings had at least one inconsistency flag raised and 22% had two or more. Application of flags to clinical ratings may improve reliability of ratings and validity of trials. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect