Efficacy of the resilience and adjustment intervention after traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial
Autor: | Jennifer H. Marwitz, Adam Sima, Ana Mills, Herman R. Lukow, Nancy H. Hsu, Jeffrey S. Kreutzer |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male 030506 rehabilitation medicine.medical_specialty Traumatic brain injury media_common.quotation_subject Neuroscience (miscellaneous) law.invention 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Primary outcome Randomized controlled trial law Surveys and Questionnaires Intervention (counseling) Adaptation Psychological Brain Injuries Traumatic Outcome Assessment Health Care Developmental and Educational Psychology Psychological support Humans Medicine Glasgow Coma Scale Retrospective Studies media_common business.industry Retrospective cohort study Middle Aged Resilience Psychological medicine.disease Psychotherapy Treatment Outcome Physical therapy Female Neurology (clinical) Psychological resilience 0305 other medical science business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Follow-Up Studies |
Zdroj: | Brain Injury. 32:963-971 |
ISSN: | 1362-301X 0269-9052 |
DOI: | 10.1080/02699052.2018.1468577 |
Popis: | Examine a psychoeducational and skill-building intervention's effectiveness for individuals after traumatic brain injury (TBI), using a two-arm, parallel, randomized, controlled trial with wait-listed control.The Resilience and Adjustment Intervention (RAI) targets adjustment challenges and emphasizes education, skill-building and psychological support. Overall, 160 outpatients were randomly assigned to a treatment or wait-list control (WLC) group. The manualized treatment was delivered in seven 1-h sessions. The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) was the primary outcome measure. Secondary measures included the Mayo Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 (MPAI-4), Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18) and 13-Item Stress Test.After adjusting for injury severity, education and time postinjury, the RAI group (N = 75) demonstrated a significantly greater increase in resilience (effect size = 1.03) compared to the WLC group (N = 73). Participants in the RAI group demonstrated more favourable scores on the MPAI-4 Adjustment and Ability Indices, BSI-18 and the 13-item Stress Test. However, only the CD-RISC and BSI-18 demonstrated a clinically significant difference. In addition, RAI participants demonstrated maintenance of gains from pre-treatment to 3-month follow-up; however, only the BSI-18 maintained a clinically significant difference.Investigation provided evidence that a resilience-focused intervention can improve psychological health and adjustment after TBI. Additional research is needed to ascertain the longer term benefits of intervention and the efficacy of alternative delivery methods (e.g., via telephone, Internet). |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |