Misdiagnosis of atrial fibrillation and its clinical consequences
Autor: | Erik Wissner, Frank Bogun, W. Douglas Weaver, Gautham Kalahasty, Chadi Bou Serhal, Daejoon Anh, Rabih Bazzi, Claudio Schuger |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2004 |
Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Atrial dysrhythmias Heart disease Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation Diagnosis Differential Electrocardiography Internal medicine Atrial Fibrillation medicine Humans Diagnosis Computer-Assisted cardiovascular diseases Diagnostic Errors Intensive care medicine Aged Aged 80 and over Observer Variation Medical treatment business.industry Medical record Signal Processing Computer-Assisted Atrial fibrillation General Medicine Middle Aged Ordering Physician medicine.disease Computer algorithm Cardiology Female business Anti-Arrhythmia Agents |
Zdroj: | The American Journal of Medicine. 117:636-642 |
ISSN: | 0002-9343 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.06.024 |
Popis: | Purpose Computer algorithms are often used for cardiac rhythm interpretation and are subsequently corrected by an overreading physician. The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence and clinical consequences of misdiagnosis of atrial fibrillation based on a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). Methods We retrieved 2298 ECGs with the computerized interpretation of atrial fibrillation from 1085 patients. The ECGs were reinterpreted to determine the accuracy of the interpretation. In patients in whom the interpretation was incorrect, we reviewed the medical records to assess the clinical consequences resulting from misdiagnosis. Results We found that 442 ECGs (19%) from 382 (35%) of the 1085 patients had been incorrectly interpreted as atrial fibrillation by the computer algorithm. In 92 patients (24%), the physician ordering the ECG had failed to correct the inaccurate interpretation, resulting in change in management and initiation of inappropriate treatment, including antiarrhythmic medications and anticoagulation in 39 patients (10%), as well as unnecessary additional diagnostic testing in 90 patients (24%). A final diagnosis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation based on the initial incorrect interpretation of the ECGs was generated in 43 patients (11%). Conclusion Incorrect computerized interpretation of atrial fibrillation, combined with the failure of the ordering physician to correct the erroneous interpretation, can result in the initiation of unnecessary, potentially harmful medical treatment as well as inappropriate use of medical resources. Greater efforts should be directed toward educating physicians about the electrocardiographic appearance of atrial dysrhythmias and in the recognition of confounding artifacts. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |