Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the LMC Skills, Confidence & Preparedness Index (SCPI) in patients with type 2 diabetes
| Autor: | Gendi Lu, Weibo Lyu, Ying Yu, Liting Wang, Aihua Li, Weijin Xu, Ronnie Aronson, Yang Cao, Ximin Wang, Huiting Lin |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Male
China Translation Psychometrics 030209 endocrinology & metabolism Cross-cultural adaption lcsh:Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics Validity 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Cronbach's alpha Criterion validity Content validity Self-management Humans Translations Aged 030503 health policy & services Research Diabetes Public Health Environmental and Occupational Health Discriminant validity Construct validity Reproducibility of Results General Medicine SCPI Middle Aged Assessment tool Reliability Confirmatory factor analysis Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 Preparedness Scale (social sciences) lcsh:R858-859.7 Female 0305 other medical science Psychology Factor Analysis Statistical Clinical psychology |
| Zdroj: | Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021) Health and Quality of Life Outcomes |
| ISSN: | 1477-7525 |
| Popis: | Background A variety of diabetes self-management instruments have been developed but few of them consist of the preparedness for diabetes self-management behavior. The novel psychometric evaluation tool “the LMC Skills, Confidence & Preparedness Index (SCPI)” measures three key aspects of a patient’s diabetes self-management: knowledge of the skill, confidence in being able to perform skill and preparedness to implement the skill. The objective of this study was to translate, adapt and validate the SCPI for use in Chinese adult patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods This study followed the guideline recommended by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Evidence Based Medicine Committee (AAOS) to indigenize the scale. Forward and back translation, and cross-cultural language debugging were completed according to the recommended steps. A convenience sample of Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes (n = 375) were recruited from a university-affiliated hospital in Shanghai. The validity (criterion, discriminant validity, and construct validity), reliability (internal consistency and test–retest reliability) and the interpretability of the instrument were examined. The content validity was calculated by experts’ evaluation. Results The Chinese version of SCPI (C-SCPI) has good internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.92. The ceiling effects of the preparedness subscales is 21%. The criterion validity of three dimensions of C-SCPI was established with significantly moderate correlations between the DKT, DES-SF and SDSCA (p 2/df = 2.775, RMSEA = 0.069, CFI = 0.903, GFI = 0.873, TLI = 0.889, IFI = 0.904. The test–retest reliability coefficient was 0.61 (p Conclusion We established a Chinese version of SCPI through translation and cross-cultural adaptation. The C-SCPI is reliable and valid for assessment of the level of self-management in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
| Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |