Adolescent Judgments and Reasoning About the Failure to Include Peers with Social Disabilities
| Autor: | Kristen Bottema-Beutel, Zhushan Li |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2015 |
| Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Adolescent Logical reasoning Public health education Moral reasoning Morals medicine.disease Logistic regression Peer Group Developmental psychology Judgment Adolescent Behavior Child Development Disorders Pervasive Autism spectrum disorder Intervention (counseling) Developmental and Educational Psychology medicine Humans Autism Female Social Behavior Psychology Inclusion (education) |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 45:1873-1886 |
| ISSN: | 1573-3432 0162-3257 |
| Popis: | Adolescents with autism spectrum disorder often do not have access to crucial peer social activities. This study examines how typically developing adolescents evaluate decisions not to include a peer based on disability status, and the justifications they apply to these decisions. A clinical interview methodology was used to elicit judgments and justifications across four contexts. We found adolescents are more likely to judge the failure to include as acceptable in personal as compared to public contexts. Using logistic regression, we found that adolescents are more likely to provide moral justifications as to why failure to include is acceptable in a classroom as compared to home, lab group, and soccer practice contexts. Implications for intervention are also discussed. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|