Lack of activity of betulin-based Oleogel-S10 in the treatment of actinic keratoses: a randomized, multicentre, placebo-controlled double-blind phase II trial
| Autor: | Annette Pflugfelder, C. Schempp, Alexandros Stratigos, Benjamin Weide, Claus Garbe, E. Andonov, Thomas Eigentler, Thomas Dirschka, Jürgen Bauer, Eggert Stockfleth, S. Krüger-Krasagakis |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2014 |
| Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Dermatology Placebo Gastroenterology Drug Administration Schedule law.invention chemistry.chemical_compound Randomized controlled trial Double-Blind Method law Internal medicine medicine Humans Prospective Studies Organic Chemicals Prospective cohort study Aged Aged 80 and over Betulin business.industry Parallel study Middle Aged Triterpenes Surgery Clinical trial Keratosis Actinic Treatment Outcome Tolerability chemistry Histopathology Female Dermatologic Agents business |
| Zdroj: | The British journal of dermatology. 172(4) |
| ISSN: | 1365-2133 |
| Popis: | Background Betulinic acid and other triterpenes have shown strong antitumour activity in vitro and in vivo. A triterpene extract of birch bark formed the base of Oleogel-S10 and allowed topical application. Two previous trials have shown efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of actinic keratoses (AKs) with betulin-based Oleogel-S10. Objectives To confirm the efficacy and tolerability/safety of Oleogel-S10 in the treatment of AKs in a multicentre placebo-controlled study. Methods Patients (n = 165) were treated topically for 3 months in a four-arm parallel study design, randomly allocated to A (n = 53) Oleogel-S10 once daily, B (n = 51) Oleogel-S10 twice daily, or C (n = 25) or D (n = 28) placebo (petroleum jelly) once or twice daily, respectively. Clinical efficacy in this double-blind study was assessed by the investigators. Final and baseline biopsies were evaluated by central histopathology. Results Complete clearance of the target lesions was seen in 4% of patients in group A and 7% in group B, but not in the placebo groups. A clearance rate of > 75% was seen for 15% and 18% of patients in groups A and B, respectively, and for 13% in the placebo groups. These differences were not statistically significant. Histopathologically, 43·9% of patients showed a downgrading or clearance of the marker AK with no significant differences between the groups. Treatment with Oleogel-S10 was well tolerated. The tolerability as assessed by the investigator was mostly 'very good' (78·8%), followed by 'good' (18·2%) and only 1·2% assessed it as 'intolerable'. Patient-assessed tolerability was graded mostly 'very good' (56·4%) or 'good' (34·5%). Conclusions Treatment with Oleogel-S10 was well tolerated during a treatment period of 3 months, yet was no better than placebo in terms of efficacy in the treatment of AKs. What's already known about this topic? Previous single open-label trials have shown activity for Oleogel-S10 in actinic keratoses, with a clearance of > 75% of the lesions in 79% and 86% of patients. What does this study add? In this multicentre randomized double-blind trial Oleogel-S10 was highly tolerable but could not demonstrate superiority over placebo treatment. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text