Hip and Knee Kinetics During a Back Squat and Deadlift
| Autor: | Kevin H. Choe, Jared W. Coburn, Derek N. Pamukoff, Pablo B. Costa |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Male
Knee Joint Weight Lifting Posture Physical Therapy Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation Squat 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine One-repetition maximum Humans Medicine Knee Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Knee extensors business.industry 030229 sport sciences General Medicine Confidence interval Weight lifting Biomechanical Phenomena Kinetics Anesthesia Female business Lower extremity joint |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 35:1364-1371 |
| ISSN: | 1064-8011 |
| DOI: | 10.1519/jsc.0000000000002908 |
| Popis: | Choe, KH, Coburn, JW, Costa, PB, and Pamukoff, DN. Hip and knee kinetics during a back-squat and deadlift. J Strength Cond Res 35(5): 1364-1371, 2021-The back-squat and deadlift are performed to improve hip and knee extensor function. The purpose of this study was to compare lower extremity joint kinetics (peak net joint moments [NJMs] and positive joint work [PJW]) between the back-squat and deadlift. Twenty-eight resistance-trained subjects (17 men: 23.7 ± 4.3 years, 1.76 ± 0.09 m, 78.11 ± 10.91 kg; 11 women: 23.0 ± 1.9 years, 1.66 ± 0.06 m, 65.36 ± 7.84 kg) were recruited. One repetition maximum (1RM) testing and biomechanical analyses occurred on separate days. Three-dimensional biomechanics of the back-squat and deadlift were recorded at 70 and 85% 1RM for each exercise. The deadlift demonstrated larger hip extensor NJM than the back-squat {3.59 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.30-3.88) vs. 2.98 (95% CI: 2.72-3.23) Nm·kg-1, d = 0.81, p < 0.001}. However, the back-squat had a larger knee extensor NJM compared with the deadlift (2.14 [95% CI: 1.88-2.40] vs. 1.18 [95% CI: 0.99-1.37] Nm·kg-1, d = 1.44 p < 0.001). More knee PJW was performed during the back-squat compared with the deadlift (1.85 [95% CI: 1.60-2.09] vs. 0.46 [95% CI: 0.35-0.58] J·kg-1, d = 2.10, p < 0.001). However, there was more hip PJW during the deadlift compared with the back-squat (3.22 [95% CI: 2.97-3.47] vs. 2.37 [95% CI: 2.21-2.54] J·kg-1, d = 1.30, p < 0.001). Larger hip extensor NJM and PJW during the deadlift suggest that individuals targeting their hip extensors may yield greater benefit from the deadlift compared with the back-squat. However, larger knee extensor NJM and PJW during the back-squat suggest that individuals targeting their knee extensor muscles may benefit from incorporating the back-squat compared with the deadlift. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|