Diagnostic accuracy of patient interview items and clinical tests for cervical radiculopathy
| Autor: | Michel W. Coppieters, Arianne P. Verhagen, Marije L. S. Sleijser-Koehorst, Rob Epping, Gwendolyne G M Scholten-Peeters, S. Rooker |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | General Practice, AMS - Rehabilitation & Development, Neuromechanics, AMS - Musculoskeletal Health |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
030506 rehabilitation
medicine.medical_specialty Provocation test Physical Therapy Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation Physical examination 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being medicine Humans Medical history 030212 general & internal medicine Prospective Studies Radiculopathy Neck pain Neck Pain medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Spurling test Rehabilitation Gold standard (test) medicine.disease Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radicular pain Orthopedic surgery Physical therapy Arm Human medicine medicine.symptom 0305 other medical science business 1103 Clinical Sciences 1106 Human Movement and Sports Sciences 1199 Other Medical and Health Sciences |
| Zdroj: | Sleijser-Koehorst, M L S, Coppieters, M W, Epping, R, Rooker, S, Verhagen, A P & Scholten-Peeters, G G M 2021, ' Diagnostic accuracy of patient interview items and clinical tests for cervical radiculopathy ', Physiotherapy, vol. 111, pp. 74-82 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2020.07.007 Physiotherapy (United Kingdom), 111, 74-82. Elsevier Physiotherapy, 111, 74-82. Elsevier Physiotherapy: the journal of the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy |
| ISSN: | 0031-9406 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.physio.2020.07.007 |
| Popis: | To determine the diagnostic accuracy of patient interview items and clinical tests to diagnose cervical radiculopathy. Design A prospective diagnostic accuracy study. Participants Consecutive patients (N = 134) with a suspicion of cervical radiculopathy were included. A medical specialist made the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy based on the patient's clinical presentation and corresponding Magnetic Resonance Imaging findings. Participants completed a list of patient interview items and the clinical tests were performed by a physiotherapist. Main outcome measures Diagnostic accuracy was determined in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and positive (+LR) and negative likelihood ratios (-LR). Sensitivity and specificity values >= 0.80 were considered high. We considered +LR >= 5 and -LR = 10and -LR |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect