Shear bond strength and SEM morphology evaluation of different dental adhesives to enamel prepared with ER:YAG laser
| Autor: | Paulo Melo, Sofia S.A. Oliveira, João Ferreira, Patrícia T. Pires, Álvaro Azevedo, Walter R. Dias |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2013 |
| Předmět: |
Materials science
Scanning electron microscope Dentistry enamel-surface preparation Orthodontics Context (language use) shear bond strength stomatognathic system Etching (microfabrication) laser conditioning dental enamel SEM morphology Enamel paint Bond strength business.industry Isotropic etching self-etch lcsh:RK1-715 stomatognathic diseases Er-YAG laser visual_art lcsh:Dentistry visual_art.visual_art_medium Adhesion Periodontics Original Article Adhesive Oral Surgery business Er:YAG laser Nuclear chemistry |
| Zdroj: | Contemporary Clinical Dentistry Contemporary Clinical Dentistry, Vol 4, Iss 1, Pp 20-26 (2013) |
| ISSN: | 0976-2361 0976-237X |
| Popis: | Context: Early observations of enamel surfaces prepared by erbium lasers motivated clinicians to use laser as an alternative to chemical etching. Aims: Evaluate shear bond strength (SBS) values of different dental adhesives on Erbium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Er:YAG) laser prepared enamel and to evaluate possible etching patterns correlations between dental adhesives and SBS values. Subjects and Methods: One hundred bovine incisors were randomly assigned to SBS tests on enamel (n = 15) and to enamel morphology analysis ( n = 5) after Er:YAG laser preparation as follows: Group I - 37% phosphoric acid (PA)+ ExciTE® ; Group II - ExciTE® ; Group III - AdheSE® self-etching; Group IV - FuturaBond® no-rinse. NR; Group V - Xeno® V. Teeth were treated with the adhesive systems and subjected to thermal cycling. SBS were performed in a universal testing machine at 5 mm/min. Statistical Analysis Used: One-way ANOVA and post-hoc tests (p < 0.05). For the morphology evaluation, specimens were immersed in Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) and the etching pattern analyzed under Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). Results: Mean bond strengths were Group I - 47.17 ± 1.61 MPa (type I etching pattern); Group II - 32.56 ± 1.64 MPa, Group III - 29.10 ± 1.34 MPa, Group IV - 23.32 ± 1.53 MPa (type III etching pattern); Group V - 24.43 MPa ± 1.55 (type II etching pattern). Conclusions: Different adhesive systems yielded significantly different SBSs. Acid etching significantly increased the adhesion in laser treated enamel. No differences in SBS values were obtained between AdheSE® and ExciTE® without condition with PA. FuturaBond® NR and Xeno® V showed similar SBS, which was lower in comparison to the others adhesives. No correlation between enamel surface morphology and SBS values was observed, except when PA was used. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|