Did RNA editing in plant organellar genomes originate under natural selection or through genetic drift?
| Autor: | Richard W. Jobson, Yin Long Qiu |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Předmět: |
0106 biological sciences
Immunology Biology Genes Plant 01 natural sciences Genome General Biochemistry Genetics and Molecular Biology Evolution Molecular 03 medical and health sciences Phylogenetics Arabidopsis thaliana Amino Acids Selection Genetic Codon lcsh:QH301-705.5 Gene Phylogeny Ecology Evolution Behavior and Systematics Plant Proteins 030304 developmental biology Organelles Genetics 0303 health sciences Natural selection Base Sequence Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all) Biochemistry Genetics and Molecular Biology(all) Research Applied Mathematics Genetic Drift Membrane Proteins food and beverages biology.organism_classification Molecular Weight Fixation (population genetics) lcsh:Biology (General) Membrane protein RNA editing Modeling and Simulation RNA Editing General Agricultural and Biological Sciences Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions Genome Plant Thymine 010606 plant biology & botany |
| Zdroj: | Biology Direct Biology Direct, Vol 3, Iss 1, p 43 (2008) |
| ISSN: | 1745-6150 |
| DOI: | 10.1186/1745-6150-3-43 |
| Popis: | Background The C↔U substitution types of RNA editing have been observed frequently in organellar genomes of land plants. Although various attempts have been made to explain why such a seemingly inefficient genetic mechanism would have evolved, no satisfactory explanation exists in our view. In this study, we examined editing patterns in chloroplast genomes of the hornwort Anthoceros formosae and the fern Adiantum capillus-veneris and in mitochondrial genomes of the angiosperms Arabidopsis thaliana, Beta vulgaris and Oryza sativa, to gain an understanding of the question of how RNA editing originated. Results We found that 1) most editing sites were distributed at the 2nd and 1st codon positions, 2) editing affected codons that resulted in larger hydrophobicity and molecular size changes much more frequently than those with little change involved, 3) editing uniformly increased protein hydrophobicity, 4) editing occurred more frequently in ancestrally T-rich sequences, which were more abundant in genes encoding membrane-bound proteins with many hydrophobic amino acids than in genes encoding soluble proteins, and 5) editing occurred most often in genes found to be under strong selective constraint. Conclusion These analyses show that editing mostly affects functionally important and evolutionarily conserved codon positions, codons and genes encoding membrane-bound proteins. In particular, abundance of RNA editing in plant organellar genomes may be associated with disproportionately large percentages of genes in these two genomes that encode membrane-bound proteins, which are rich in hydrophobic amino acids and selectively constrained. These data support a hypothesis that natural selection imposed by protein functional constraints has contributed to selective fixation of certain editing sites and maintenance of the editing activity in plant organelles over a period of more than four hundred millions years. The retention of genes encoding RNA editing activity may be driven by forces that shape nucleotide composition equilibrium in two organellar genomes of these plants. Nevertheless, the causes of lineage-specific occurrence of a large portion of RNA editing sites remain to be determined. Reviewers This article was reviewed by Michael Gray (nominated by Laurence Hurst), Kirsten Krause (nominated by Martin Lercher), and Jeffery Mower (nominated by David Ardell). |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|