A response‐adaptive randomization procedure for multi‐armed clinical trials with normally distributed outcomes
Autor: | S. Faye Williamson, Sofia S. Villar |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Statistics and Probability
Gittins index Mathematical optimization Biometry Patient Dropouts Biometrics Computer science Endpoint Determination Context (language use) 01 natural sciences General Biochemistry Genetics and Molecular Biology 010104 statistics & probability 03 medical and health sciences Response adaptive randomization missing data Clinical Trials Phase II as Topic adaptive designs Neoplasms Humans Computer Simulation 0101 mathematics 030304 developmental biology Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic 0303 health sciences Models Statistical General Immunology and Microbiology Randomization Procedure Adaptive Clinical Trials as Topic Applied Mathematics General Medicine Variance (accounting) Missing data 3. Good health unknown variance Clinical trial Treatment Outcome dichotomization Biometric Methodology continuous endpoint General Agricultural and Biological Sciences Algorithms |
Zdroj: | Biometrics |
ISSN: | 1541-0420 0006-341X |
Popis: | We propose a novel response‐adaptive randomization procedure for multi‐armed trials with continuous outcomes that are assumed to be normally distributed. Our proposed rule is non‐myopic, and oriented toward a patient benefit objective, yet maintains computational feasibility. We derive our response‐adaptive algorithm based on the Gittins index for the multi‐armed bandit problem, as a modification of the method first introduced in Villar et al. (Biometrics, 71, pp. 969‐978). The resulting procedure can be implemented under the assumption of both known or unknown variance. We illustrate the proposed procedure by simulations in the context of phase II cancer trials. Our results show that, in a multi‐armed setting, there are efficiency and patient benefit gains of using a response‐adaptive allocation procedure with a continuous endpoint instead of a binary one. These gains persist even if an anticipated low rate of missing data due to deaths, dropouts, or complete responses is imputed online through a procedure first introduced in this paper. Additionally, we discuss how there are response‐adaptive designs that outperform the traditional equal randomized design both in terms of efficiency and patient benefit measures in the multi‐armed trial context. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |