Proportion and reasons for loss to follow-up in a cohort study of people who inject drugs to measure HIV and HCV incidence in Kerman, Iran
Autor: | Mehrdad Khezri, Jasem Zarei, Willi McFarland, Nima Ghalekhani, Ghazal Mousavian, Armita Shahesmaeili, Hamid Sharifi, Heidar Sharafi, Ali Mirzazadeh, Fatemeh Tavakoli, Soheil Mehmandoost |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
lcsh:Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 030508 substance abuse HIV Infections Loss to follow-up Iran medicine.disease_cause Hepatitis lcsh:HV1-9960 Cohort Studies Substance Misuse 0302 clinical medicine Psychology 030212 general & internal medicine Substance Abuse Intravenous Incidence Liver Disease Health Policy Incidence (epidemiology) lcsh:Public aspects of medicine Substance Abuse Follow-up study Reminder system Hepatitis C Psychiatry and Mental health Health psychology Treatment intervention Infectious Diseases Pharmaceutical Preparations Cohort HIV/AIDS Intravenous 0305 other medical science People who inject drugs Cohort study Adult medicine.medical_specialty Adolescent Referral 03 medical and health sciences Hepatitis - C Clinical Research Behavioral and Social Science medicine Humans business.industry Research Prevention Public health lcsh:RA1-1270 Emerging Infectious Diseases Good Health and Well Being Family medicine Drug Abuse (NIDA only) Digestive Diseases business Follow-Up Studies |
Zdroj: | Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021) Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, vol 16, iss 1 Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy |
Popis: | Background Understanding the reasons for loss to follow-up (LTFU) in cohort studies, especially among marginalized groups such as people who inject drugs (PWID), is needed to strengthen the rigor of efficacy trials for prevention and treatment interventions. We assessed the proportion and reasons for loss to follow-up in a recent cohort of PWID enrolled in the southeast of Iran. Methods Using respondent-driven sampling, we recruited 98 PWID age 18 years or older who reported injecting drugs in the past 6 months, and were negative for HIV and HCV at initial screening. Participants were followed at 6 week intervals, alternating a short six-week visit and long 12-week or quarterly visit to measure incidence of HIV and HCV. Methods to enhance retention included incentives for completing each visit, tracking people who missed the scheduled visits through their peer referral networks, engaged outreach teams to explore hotspots and residences, and photos. LTFU was defined as participants who missed their quarterly visits for two or more weeks. Results Mean (SD) age of participants was 39.7 years (SD 9.6). Of 98 enrolled, 50 participants (51.0%) were LTFU by missed their scheduled quarterly visits for 2 weeks or more. For those whose reasons for LTFU could be defined (46.0%, 23 of 50), main reasons were: forgetting the date of visit (43.5%, 10 of 23), being incarcerated (39.1%, 9 of 23), and moving out of the city (17.4%, 4 of 23). Conclusion This study highlighted the difficulty in retaining PWID in longitudinal studies. Despite having several retention strategies in place, over half of PWID were LTFU. The LTFU might be reduced by setting up more effective reminder systems, working closely with security systems, and online means to reach those who move outside the study area. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |