Ethnic and Racial Differences in Ratings in the Medical Student Standardized Letters of Evaluation (SLOE)
| Autor: | Al'ai Alvarez, Alexandra Mannix, Dayle Davenport, Katarzyna Gore, Sara M. Krzyzaniak, Melissa Parsons, Danielle T. Miller, Daniel Eraso, Sandra Monteiro, Teresa M. Chan, Michael Gottlieb |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2022 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | J Grad Med Educ |
| ISSN: | 1949-8357 1949-8349 |
| DOI: | 10.4300/jgme-d-21-01174.1 |
| Popis: | Background The Standardized Letter of Evaluation (SLOE) stratifies the assessment of emergency medicine (EM) bound medical applicants. However, bias in SLOE, particularly regarding race and ethnicity, is an underexplored area. Objective This study aims to assess whether underrepresented in medicine (UIM) and non-UIM applicants are rated differently in SLOE components. Methods This was a cross-section study of EM-bound applicants across 3 geographically distinct US training programs during the 2019-2020 application cycle. Using descriptive and regression analyses, we examine the differences between UIM applicants and non-UIM applicants for each of the SLOE components: 7 qualifications of an EM physician (7QEM), global assessment (GA) rating, and projected rank list (RL) position. Results Out of a combined total of 3759, 2002 (53.3%) unique EM-bound applicants were included. UIM applicants had lower ratings for each of the 7QEM questions, GA, and RL positions. Compared to non-UIM applicants, only some of the 7QEM components: “Work ethic and ability to assume responsibility,” “Ability to work in a team, and “Ability to communicate a caring nature,” were associated with their SLOE. “Commitment to EM” correlated more with GA for UIM than for non-UIM applicants. Conclusions This study shows a difference in SLOE rating, with UIM applicants receiving lower ratings than non-UIM applicants. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|