Assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape MS8, RF3 and MS8×RF3 for renewal of authorisation under regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐004)

Autor: Christophe Robaglia, Josep Casacuberta, Christoph Tebbe, Konstantinos Paraskevopoulos, Francesco Visioli, Jeremy Sweet, Yann Devos, Barbara Manachini, Huw Jones, Fabien Nogué, Elsa Ebbesen Nielsen, Michele Ardizzone, Antoine Messéan, Andrew Nicholas Birch, Nils Rostoks, Philippe Guerche, Adinda De Schrijver, Jean-Michel Wal, Mikołaj Antoni Gralak, Hanspeter Naegeli
Přispěvatelé: Naegeli, Hanspeter, Birch, Andrew Nichola, Casacuberta, Josep, De Schrijver, Adinda, Gralak, Mikołaj Antoni, Guerche, Philippe, Jones, Huw, Manachini, Barbara, Messéan, Antoine, Nielsen, Elsa Ebbesen, Nogué, Fabien, Robaglia, Christophe, Rostoks, Nil, Sweet, Jeremy, Tebbe, Christoph, Visioli, Francesco, Wal, Jean‐Michel, Ardizzone, Michele, Devos, Yann, Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos, Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin (IJPB), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, University of Zurich
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2017
Předmět:
Zdroj: EFSA Journal
EFSA Journal, European Food Safety Authority, 2017, 15 (11), pp.1-12. ⟨10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5067⟩
EFSA Journal 11 (15), 1-12. (2017)
ISSN: 2314-9396
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5067⟩
Popis: Efsa Panel On Genetically Modified Organisms (gmo)Opinion scientificRequestor: European CommissionQuestion number: EFSA-Q-2016-00569; Following the submission of application EFSA-GMO-RX-004 under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Bayer CropScience, the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms of the European Food Safety Authority (GMO Panel) was asked to deliver a scientific risk assessment on the data submitted in the context of the renewal of authorisation application of the genetically modified (GM) herbicide-tolerant oilseed rape MS8, RF3 and MS89RF3. The data received in the context of this renewal application contain post-market environmental monitoring reports, systematic searches and evaluation of literature, updated bioinformatics analyses, and additional documents or studies performed by or on behalf of the applicant. The GMO Panel assessed these data for possible new hazards, modified exposure or new scientific uncertainties identified during the authorisation period and not previously assessed in the context of the original application. Under the assumption that the DNA sequence of the event in oilseed rape MS8, RF3 and MS89RF3 considered for renewed authorisation is identical to the sequence of the originally assessed event, the GMO Panel concludes that there is no evidence in the context of this renewal application for new hazards, modified exposure or scientific uncertainties that would change the conclusions of the original risk assessment on oilseed rape MS8, RF3 and MS89RF3.
Databáze: OpenAIRE