Personality Constructs and Paradigms in the AlternativeDSM-5Model of Personality Disorder
| Autor: | Mark H. Waugh, Jonathan M. Adler, Darren J. Garcia, John E. Kurtz, Abby L. Mulay, Rebecca M. Skadberg, Christopher J. Hopwood, Katherine A. Lenger, Nicole M. Cain |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | University of Zurich, Mulay, Abby L |
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Nosology
050103 clinical psychology Personality Inventory Health Toxicology and Mutagenesis media_common.quotation_subject Identity (social science) 050109 social psychology Models Psychological Narrative identity Personality Assessment Personality Disorders DSM-5 2738 Psychiatry and Mental Health Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) Surveys and Questionnaires 2307 Health Toxicology and Mutagenesis medicine Humans Personality Toxicology and Mutagenesis 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences media_common 10093 Institute of Psychology 3203 Clinical Psychology 05 social sciences medicine.disease Personality disorders Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Clinical Psychology Health Symptom Assessment Personality Assessment Inventory 150 Psychology Psychology Construct (philosophy) Cognitive psychology |
| DOI: | 10.5167/uzh-217816 |
| Popis: | The DSM-5 Section III alternative model for personality disorders (AMPD) is a personality disorder (PD) nosology based on severity of personality dysfunction and pathological traits. We examined the degree to which the personality constructs identified by McAdams and Pals (2006; dispositional traits, characteristic adaptations, narrative identity) and the paradigms of personality assessment described by Wiggins (2003; psychodynamic, interpersonal, personological, multivariate, empirical) are represented within the AMPD. Nine raters expert with the AMPD and personality evaluated elements of Criterion A and the 25 trait facets of Criterion B for presence of type and degree of personality constructs and paradigms, as well as level of inference. Criterion B showed higher rater agreement compared to Criterion A. Criteria A and B reflect different configurations of construct, paradigm, and level of inference. The characteristic adaptation construct and interpersonal paradigm were strongly reflected in both Criteria A and B. The psychodynamic and personological paradigms and the narrative identity construct were highly correlated, and the multivariate, empirical, and dispositional traits variables were highly correlated. Results illustrate differential conceptual emphases as well as areas of overlap with Criteria A and B. This characterization highlights that PD nosology rests on personality theory and suggests implications for integrative PD assessment. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|