| Autor: |
Floris K, Hendriks, Jeffrey H W, Kuijpers, Janneau M X, van Kranenburg, Joan M G, Senden, Frank M, van der Sande, Jeroen P, Kooman, Steven J R, Meex, Luc J C, van Loon |
| Přispěvatelé: |
Humane Biologie, RS: NUTRIM - R3 - Respiratory & Age-related Health, RS: NUTRIM - R1 - Obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular health, Interne Geneeskunde, MUMC+: MA Nefrologie (9), RS: Carim - V02 Hypertension and target organ damage, Biochemie, MUMC+: DA CDL Algemeen (9), RS: Carim - B01 Blood proteins & engineering, Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Human Physiology and Sports Physiotherapy Research Group |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2023 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Journal of Renal Nutrition, 33(2), 376-385. W B Saunders Co-Elsevier Inc |
| ISSN: |
1051-2276 |
| DOI: |
10.1053/j.jrn.2022.07.006 |
| Popis: |
OBJECTIVE: Dietary protein and physical activity interventions are increasingly implemented during hemodialysis to support muscle maintenance in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Although muscle maintenance is important, adequate removal of uremic toxins throughout hemodialysis is the primary concern for patients. It remains to be established whether intradialytic protein ingestion and/or exercise modulate uremic toxin removal during hemodialysis. METHODS: We recruited 10 patients with ESRD (age: 65 ± 16 y, BMI: 24.2 ± 4.8 kg/m2) on chronic hemodialysis treatment to participate in this randomized cross-over trial. During hemodialysis, patients were assigned to ingest 40 g protein or a nonprotein placebo both at rest (protein [PRO] and placebo [PLA], respectively) and following 30 min of exercise (PRO + exercise [EX] and PLA + EX, respectively). Blood and spent dialysate samples were collected throughout hemodialysis to assess reduction ratios and removal of urea, creatinine, phosphate, cystatin C, and indoxyl sulfate. RESULTS: The reduction ratios of urea and indoxyl sulfate were higher during PLA (76 ± 6% and 46 ± 9%, respectively) and PLA + EX interventions (77 ± 5% and 45 ± 10%, respectively) when compared to PRO (72 ± 4% and 40 ± 8%, respectively) and PRO + EX interventions (73 ± 4% and 43 ± 7%, respectively; protein effect: P = .001 and P = .023, respectively; exercise effect: P = .25 and P = .52, respectively). Nonetheless, protein ingestion resulted in greater urea removal (P = .046) during hemodialysis. Reduction ratios and removal of creatinine, phosphate, and cystatin C during hemodialysis did not differ following intradialytic protein ingestion or exercise (protein effect: P > .05; exercise effect: P>.05). Urea, creatinine, and phosphate removal were greater throughout the period with intradialytic exercise during PLA + EX and PRO + EX interventions when compared to the same period during PLA and PRO interventions (exercise effect: P = .034, P = .039, and P = .022, respectively). CONCLUSION: The removal of uremic toxins is not compromised by protein feeding and/or exercise implementation during hemodialysis in patients with ESRD. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
