Chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for localized gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
Autor: | Fernanda Capareli, Gabriel C. B. Pereira, Rossana Verónica Mendoza López, Daniel Girardi, Mariana A.G. de Lima, Paulo M. Hoff, Jorge Sabbaga, Marcelo V. Negrao |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male Cancer Research medicine.medical_specialty Propensity score Nausea medicine.medical_treatment Kaplan-Meier Estimate Neutropenia Gastroenterology lcsh:RC254-282 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Recurrence Stomach Neoplasms Internal medicine Genetics medicine Mucositis Humans Chemotherapy 030212 general & internal medicine Adjuvant Aged Neoplasm Staging Proportional Hazards Models Retrospective Studies Aged 80 and over EVENTO ADVERSO A MEDICAMENTO business.industry Chemoradiotherapy Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Middle Aged medicine.disease lcsh:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens Regimen Treatment Outcome Oncology Tolerability Chemotherapy Adjuvant 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Female medicine.symptom business Gastric cancer Febrile neutropenia Research Article |
Zdroj: | BMC Cancer, Vol 18, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2018) Repositório Institucional da USP (Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual) Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP BMC Cancer |
ISSN: | 1471-2407 |
Popis: | Background Treatment of localized gastric cancer (LGC) consists of surgical resection followed by adjuvant treatment. Both chemoradiation (CRT) and chemotherapy (CT) regimens have shown benefit in survival outcomes versus observation. However, there are few data comparing these approaches. Methods This study included consecutive patients with LGC treated at Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo (ICESP) from 2012 to 2015. CRT was based on the INT-0116 regimen and CT consisted of a platinum and fluoropyrimidine doublet. Treatment choice was based on physician preference. Toxicity was evaluated for every cycle. Overall survival (OS) analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to minimize selection bias. Results A total of 309 patients were evaluated, 227 in CRT group and 82 in CT group. The most prevalent grade 3/4 toxicities in CRT and CT groups were: nausea/vomiting (9.25 vs 4.9%), fatigue (9.3% vs 2.4%), mucositis (4.4% vs 1.2%), neutropenia (37.8% vs 20.9%), febrile neutropenia (3.9% vs 0%), anemia (4.3% vs 6.1%), thrombocytopenia (2.6% vs 4.9%), neuropathy (0 vs 2.4%) and hand-foot syndrome (0.4% vs 2.4%). Two grade 5 toxicities (febrile neutropenia and anemia) occurred in CRT group. There was no difference in the pattern of recurrence. After a median follow-up of 23.5 months (CRT) and 20.6 months (CT), there was no difference in OS between groups. Conclusions CT and CRT present similar efficacy and tolerability as adjuvant treatment for LGC. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |