Single-Layer Continuous Versus Double-Layer Continuous Suture in Colonic Anastomoses—a Randomized Multicentre Trial (ANATECH Trial)
Autor: | L. I. Partecke, Christel Weiss, Jochen Schuld, F. Willeke, R. Boenninghoff, Stefan Post, Markus K. Diener, S. Freudenberg, Florian Herrle, Peter Kienle |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2015 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Colon Anastomotic Leak Anastomosis law.invention 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Suture (anatomy) Randomized controlled trial Ileum law medicine Clinical endpoint Humans 030212 general & internal medicine Aged Sutures business.industry Incidence Incidence (epidemiology) Anastomosis Surgical Suture Techniques Gastroenterology Length of Stay Middle Aged Colorectal surgery Surgery Elective Surgical Procedures Anastomotic leakage 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Anesthesia Female Elective Surgical Procedure business |
Zdroj: | Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 20:421-430 |
ISSN: | 1873-4626 1091-255X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11605-015-3003-0 |
Popis: | Apart from stapling methods, single- or double-layer continuous hand sutures are established techniques for colonic anastomoses. It is unclear which hand suture technique has superior anastomotic safety. This randomized trial evaluated the incidence of postoperative complications depending on anastomosis technique. This multicentre randomized trial enrolled adult elective patients between February 2004 and June 2012 in four German university hospitals. Primary endpoint was incidence of clinical anastomotic leakage until 3 months postoperatively. Estimated sample size was 768 randomized patients. Main secondary endpoints were duration of anastomotic suture, postoperative morbidity and stool patterns at 3-month follow-up. Patients and postoperative outcome assessors were blinded to the group assignment. This trial is registered (NCT00996554). Due to slow recruitment, the trial was stopped prematurely. Two hundred fifty-two patients (129 to single-layer suture anastomosis (SLA), 123 to double-layer suture anastomosis (DLA)) were randomized and analysed. Nine patients (3.6 %) were lost during follow-up. Exploratory primary endpoint analysis by intention-to-treat principle showed no significant difference for clinical anastomotic leakage between suturing techniques (SLA, 4 of 129 (3.1 %) vs. DLA, 6 of 123 (4.9 %), p = 0.532). Secondary endpoint analysis showed on average a 6-min shorter suture duration for SLA than DLA (18 min (4–49) vs. 24 min (8–50), p |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |