Disparities in Systemic Treatment Use in Advanced-stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer by Source of Health Insurance

Autor: Patrick S. Lin, Cyllene R. Morris, Theresa H.M. Keegan, Chin-Shang Li, Rosemary D. Cress, Arti Parikh-Patel, Frances B. Maguire, Kenneth W. Kizer
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
0301 basic medicine
Male
Lung Neoplasms
Epidemiology
Medical and Health Sciences
Insurance Coverage
0302 clinical medicine
Carcinoma
Non-Small-Cell Lung

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
Registries
Non-Small-Cell Lung
Lung
Cancer
Medically Uninsured
Lung Cancer
Middle Aged
Oncology
Health
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
symbols
Female
medicine.drug
medicine.medical_specialty
Bevacizumab
Medicare
03 medical and health sciences
symbols.namesake
Insurance
Clinical Research
Internal medicine
medicine
Health insurance
Humans
Poisson regression
Healthcare Disparities
Lung cancer
Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Insurance
Health

business.industry
Medicaid
Carcinoma
medicine.disease
Confidence interval
Drug Utilization
United States
Cancer registry
030104 developmental biology
Relative risk
business
Follow-Up Studies
Zdroj: Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, vol 28, iss 6
ISSN: 1538-7755
Popis: Background: Management of advanced-stage non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has changed significantly over the past two decades with the development of numerous systemic treatments, including targeted therapies. However, a high proportion of advanced-stage patients are untreated. The role that health insurance plays in receipt of systemic treatments is unclear. Methods: Using California Cancer Registry data (2012–2014), we developed multivariable Poisson regression models to assess the independent effect of health insurance type on systemic treatment utilization among patients with stage IV NSCLC. Systemic treatment information was manually abstracted from treatment text fields. Results: A total of 17,310 patients were evaluated. Patients with Medicaid/other public insurance were significantly less likely to receive any systemic treatments [risk ratio (RR), 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.75–0.82], bevacizumab combinations (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.45–0.71), or tyrosine kinase inhibitors (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.60–0.82) compared with the privately insured. Patients with Medicare or dual Medicare–Medicaid insurance were not significantly different from the privately insured in their likelihood of receiving systemic treatments. Conclusions: Substantial disparities in the use of systemic treatments for stage IV NSCLC exist by source of health insurance in California. Patients with Medicaid/other public insurance were significantly less likely to receive systemic treatments compared with their privately insured counterparts. Impact: Source of health insurance influences care received. Further research is warranted to better understand barriers to treatment that patients with Medicaid face.
Databáze: OpenAIRE