Visually and olfactorily enhanced attractive devices for thrips management

Autor: Robert W.H.M. Van Tol, Melanie M. Davidson, Willem Jan De Kogel, David A. J. Teulon, Ruth C. Butler
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
Zdroj: Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 168 (2020) 9
Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 168(9), 665-677
Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata
ISSN: 0013-8703
Popis: ‘Lure‐and‐infect’ is an insect pest management strategy with high potential but so far there are few examples of its application. Using traps as surrogates for auto‐dissemination devices, we tested the attractiveness to naturally occurring thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) of three trap types differing in colour and structure, with and without the thrips lure methyl isonicotinate (MI), and sticky plate traps as a control. The aim was to find more effective traps that could be further developed into devices for auto‐dissemination and lure‐and‐infect of thrips. The number of thrips captured varied substantially with trap type and the presence of the MI lure. We found a high visual response to a sticky ‘white ruffle’ trap (i.e., a 30‐cm‐long cylindrical outline of folded fabric), compared to a commonly used blue sticky plate trap (Bug‐scan) as the control. This effect was seen both in a greenhouse with roses (Rosa spp.), where we encountered western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande), and in a grass field, where we encountered onion thrips, Thrips tabaci Lindeman, and New Zealand flower thrips, Thrips obscuratus (Crawford). In the absence of MI, the white ruffle trap caught 7–22× more thrips than the control Bug‐scan trap. A similarly designed blue ruffle trap and a modified Lynfield trap caught lower thrips numbers than the white ruffle and the control Bug‐scan traps. Presence of MI substantially increased the captures of T. tabaci in all three trap types in the field (2.5–18×). In the greenhouse, without MI the white ruffle trap caught 3.5–14× more thrips than the Bug‐scan, blue ruffle, or modified Lynfield traps. Presence of MI increased the captures of F. occidentalis males and females in the Lynfield and blue ruffle traps (1.4–2.8×), but not in the white ruffle trap in the greenhouse (ca. 1.1×). The importance of visual and olfactory factors for the design of effective auto‐dissemination and lure‐and‐infect strategies for thrips management is discussed.
There are few examples of ‘lure‐and‐infect’ as a pest management strategy. We compared the attractiveness to naturally occurring thrips of three trap types differing in colour and structure, with and without the thrips lure methyl isonicotinate. A white ruffle trap attracted more thrips than a blue ruffle trap, a modified Lynfield device, and control sticky plates. The lure increased thrips captures in all trap types. Visually and semiochemically enhanced traps may improve the lure‐and‐infect strategy for thrips.
Databáze: OpenAIRE