Comparison between two fast threshold strategies: SPARK and SITA in normal subjects

Autor: Rebekka Heitmar, Robert P. Cubbidge, Say Kiang Foo
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
Zdroj: European Journal of Ophthalmology
ISSN: 1724-6016
1120-6721
DOI: 10.1177/1120672120926455
Popis: Background Numerous fast threshold strategies have been developed in perimetry which use maximum likelihood approaches to estimate the threshold. A recent approach to threshold estimation has been developed estimating the threshold from a limited number of test points which further reduces examination time. This strategy, SPARK, has not been compared to the SITA strategy. The aim of this study was to compare SPARK with SITA in a normal cohort to evaluate within and between strategy agreement in threshold estimates. Methods A total of 83 normal subjects each underwent two visual field examinations with SITA and SPARK on two separate occasions on a randomly selected eye. The eye examined and the order of strategy examined first was randomised but remained constant over the two perimetry visits. Results Visual field examination with SPARK Precision was on average 33% faster than SITA Standard. A positive correlation between group mean sensitivities of SITA Standard and SPARK Precision (rho = 0.713, p Conclusion The clinical examination of SPARK yields a sensitivity profile similar to SITA but in a faster examination time. The lower threshold variability of SPARK may be as a result of data smoothing in the threshold estimation process.
Databáze: OpenAIRE