Comparing usage of a web and app stress management intervention: An observational study

Autor: Mark J. Weal, Scott Lloyd, Adam W A Geraghty, Lucy Yardley, Leanne Morrison, Danius T. Michaelides, Charlie Hargood, Natalie Goodman
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
Zdroj: Internet interventions, 2018, Vol.12, pp.74-82 [Peer Reviewed Journal]
Internet Interventions
Internet Interventions, Vol 12, Iss, Pp 74-82 (2018)
Morrison, L G, Geraghty, A W A, Lloyd, S, Goodman, N, Michaelides, D T, Hargood, C, Weal, M & Yardley, L 2018, ' Comparing usage of a web and app stress management intervention : An observational study ', Internet Interventions, vol. 12, pp. 74-82 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2018.03.006
ISSN: 2214-7829
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2018.03.006
Popis: Choices in the design and delivery of digital health behaviour interventions may have a direct influence on subsequent usage and engagement. Few studies have been able to make direct, detailed comparisons of differences in usage between interventions that are delivered via web or app. This study compared the usage of two versions of a digital stress management intervention, one delivered via a website (Healthy Paths) and the other delivered via an app (Healthy Mind). Design modifications were introduced within Healthy Mind to take account of reported differences in how individuals engage with websites compared to apps and mobile phones. Data were collected as part of an observational study nested within a broader exploratory trial of Healthy Mind. Objective usage of Healthy Paths and Healthy Mind were automatically recorded, including frequency and duration of logins, access to specific components within the intervention and order of page/screen visits. Usage was compared for a two week period following initial registration. In total, 381 participants completed the registration process for Healthy Paths (web) and 162 participants completed the registration process for Healthy Mind (app). App users logged in twice as often (Mdn = 2.00) as web users (Mdn = 1.00), U = 13,059.50, p ≤ 0.001, but spent half as much time (Mdn = 5.23 min) on the intervention compared to web users (Mdn = 10.52 min), U = 19,740.00, p ≤ 0.001. Visual exploration of usage patterns over time revealed that a significantly higher proportion of app users (n = 126, 82.35%) accessed both types of support available within the intervention (i.e. awareness and change-focused tools) compared to web users (n = 92, 40.17%), χ2(1, n = 382) = 66.60, p
Highlights • Modifying the design and delivery of theoretical intervention content may alter how that content is used and received. • App users logged in twice as often but spent half as much time on the intervention compared to web users. • App users accessed more of the available intervention tools compared to web users. • Fine-grained individual-level data can enable comparison of how an intervention is used over time by different user groups.
Databáze: OpenAIRE