Community Partners in Care: 6- and 12-month Outcomes of Community Engagement versus Technical Assistance to Implement Depression Collaborative Care among Depressed Older Adults
| Autor: | Adriana Izquierdo, Jeanne Miranda, Kenneth B. Wells, Esmeralda Pulido, Michael K. Ong, Marina Berkman, Barbara Linski, Vivian Sauer |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Gerontology
Community Based Participatory Research Male Community-Based Participatory Research Epidemiology Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities Community-based participatory research Collaborative Care Community Partnered Participatory Research Older Adults 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Quality of life (healthcare) Clinical Research Intervention (counseling) Behavioral and Social Science Service planning Medicine Cluster Analysis Humans Depression Services 030212 general & internal medicine Intersectoral Collaboration Depression (differential diagnoses) Minorities Aged 030505 public health Original Report: Achieving Impact: Community Partners in Care and Beyond Community engagement business.industry Depression Prevention Community Participation Psychosocial Support Systems Health Planning Technical Assistance General Medicine Health Services Middle Aged Los Angeles Community Mental Health Services Patient Health Questionnaire Good Health and Well Being Mental Health Public Health and Health Services Quality of Life Female Public Health 0305 other medical science business |
| Zdroj: | Ethnicity & disease, vol 28, iss Suppl 2 |
| Popis: | Objective: Community Partners in Care, a community-partnered, cluster-randomized trial with depressed clients from 95 Los Angeles health and community programs, examined the added value of a community coalition approach (Community Engagement and Planning [CEP]) versus individual program technical assistance (Resources for Services [RS]) to implement depression collaborative care in underserved communities. This exploratory subanalysis examines 6- and 12-month outcomes among CPIC participants aged >50 years. Design: Community-partnered, cluster-randomized trial conducted between April 2010 and March 2012. Setting: Hollywood-Metropolitan (HM) and South Los Angeles (SLA) Service Planning Areas (SPAs), Los Angeles, California Participants: 394 participants aged >50 years with depressive symptoms (8-item Patient Health Questionnaire score ≥ 10). Intervention: A community-partnered multi-sector coalition approach (Community Engagement and Planning [CEP]) vs individual program technical assistance (Resources for Services [RS]) to implement depression collaborative care. Main Outcome Measures: Depressive symptoms (PHQ-8 score), mental health-related quality of life (MHRQL), community-prioritized outcomes including mental wellness, homelessness risk and physical activity, and services utilization. Results: At 6 months, CEP was more effective than RS at improving MHRQL and mental wellness among participants aged >50 years; no differences were found in the effects of CEP vs RS on other outcomes. No significant outcome differences between CEP and RS were found at 12 months. Conclusions: A multisector community coalition approach may offer additional benefits over individual program technical assistance to improve outcomes among depressed adults aged >50 years living in underserved communities. Ethn Dis. 2018;28(Suppl 2):339-348; doi:10.18865/ed.28.S2.339. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|