Impaired endothelial function in patients with rapidly stabilized unstable angina: assessment by noninvasive brachial artery ultrasonography
| Autor: | Carlos A. GarcGuiñaz, Alberto L. Bolaño, Eulalio Bereziuk, Marta Kura, Daniel H. Suarez, Jorge Vilariño, Carlos A. Ingino, Rogelio Machado, Ricardo J. Esper, José L. Cacharrón |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 1999 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Endothelium Brachial Artery Clinical Investigations Hemodynamics Chest pain Coronary artery disease Risk Factors medicine.artery Internal medicine Diabetes mellitus medicine Humans Angina Unstable Brachial artery Endothelial dysfunction Aged Ultrasonography Aged 80 and over business.industry Unstable angina General Medicine Middle Aged medicine.disease medicine.anatomical_structure Regional Blood Flow Cardiology Female Endothelium Vascular medicine.symptom Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business |
| Zdroj: | Clinical cardiology. 22(11) |
| ISSN: | 0160-9289 |
| Popis: | Background:Endothelial dysfunction may contribute to symptoms of instability in patients with acute coronary syndromes. High-resolution external ultrasound assessment of the brachial artery responses allows noninvasive determination of endothelial function. Hypothesis:This study was conducted to assess endothelial function in patients with unstable angina using a noninvasive technique. Methods:We studied 189 patients who were subdivided into three groups. Group 1:60 apparently healthy subjects with no cardiovascular risk factors or symptoms of coronary artery disease; Group 2: 105 subjects with cardiovascular risk factors—arterial hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, cigarette smoking, diabetes, and obesity, but no evidence of coronary artery disease; and Group 3: 24 patients with unstable angina (chest pain at rest within the 24 h preceding study entry). All patients underwent pre- and postischemic brachial artery test evaluation with measurements of internal arterial diameters and blood flow. Results:Results are expressed as percentage change from basal values. Subjects in Groups 1 and 2 showed a diameter increase of 19.1 and 11.9%, respectively, whereas patients in Group 3 showed a diameter change of 1.2% (p < 0.002 and < 0.0001, respectively). Calculated blood flow did not differ significantly in Groups 1 or 2 (74.4 and 56.4%), but was notably lower in Group 3 (18.4%, p |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|