Capsular Contracture Rate in a Low-Risk Population After Primary Augmentation Mammaplasty
| Autor: | Kyle D. Lineberry, Andrew L. Blount, Nicolas Kettaneh, David R. Alfonso, Matthew D. Martin |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2013 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty Time Factors Adolescent Breast Implants Mammaplasty Breast surgery medicine.medical_treatment Risk Assessment law.invention Cohort Studies Young Adult Age Distribution Postoperative Complications law Implant Capsular Contracture medicine Humans Breast Implantation Breast augmentation Aged Retrospective Studies business.industry Incidence Incidence (epidemiology) General Medicine Capsular contracture Middle Aged Prosthesis Failure Surgery Logistic Models Treatment Outcome Augmentation Mammoplasty Multivariate Analysis Breast implant Female Contracture medicine.symptom business Follow-Up Studies |
| Zdroj: | Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 33:516-521 |
| ISSN: | 1527-330X 1090-820X |
| DOI: | 10.1177/1090820x13484465 |
| Popis: | Background: The safety of augmentation mammaplasty has increased dramatically in the past 20 years. Capsular contracture (CC) is the most commonly reported complication of augmentation mammaplasty. Objectives: The authors report the incidence of CC in a low-risk patient population after primary augmentation. Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed the charts of 856 consecutive patients who underwent primary augmentation mammaplasty between 1999 and 2009. This series did not include patients who underwent breast augmentation–mastopexy, secondary augmentation, revision, and/or reconstruction. Data points included demographics, functional and aesthetic outcomes, complications, and revision rate/type. Results: The overall incidence of CC in 856 patients was 2.8%. Average follow-up time was 14.9 months. Antibiotic irrigation decreased CC rates from 3.9% to 0.4% ( P = .004). Tobacco users had higher rates of contracture than nonsmokers (5.5% vs 1.9%; P = .036). Saline implants had a higher CC rate than silicone gel (4.3% vs 1.3%; P = .032). Using multivariate logistic regression, CC was 7.89 times more likely in saline implants than in silicone gel ( P = .027, 95% confidence interval, 1.26–49.00). Conclusions: Based on our findings, it is apparent that the early CC rate in primary augmentation can be less than 1%. To avoid CC, we advocate an inframmamary approach, submuscular implant placement, and antibiotic irrigation of the breast pocket. Level of Evidence: 3 ![Graphic][1] [1]: /embed/inline-graphic-1.gif |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|