The prognostic impact of revascularization strategy in acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: Insights from the British Columbia Cardiac Registry

Autor: M. Bilal Iqbal, Tej Sheth, Andrew H. McNeice, David A. Wood, Imad J. Nadra, Eve Aymong, Simon D. Robinson, Anthony Della Siega, Lillian Ding, Albert W. Chan, Eric Fretz, Sanjit S. Jolly, Anthony Fung, John G. Webb, Steven Hodge, Shamir R. Mehta
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
Zdroj: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 92:E356-E367
ISSN: 1522-1946
Popis: BACKGROUND In patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and cardiogenic shock (CS), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the culprit vessel is associated with improved outcomes. A large majority of these patients have multivessel disease (MVD). Whether or not PCI of non-culprit disease in the acute setting improves outcomes continues to be debated. We evaluated the prognostic impact of revascularization strategy for patients presenting with AMI and CS. METHODS We compared culprit vessel intervention (CVI) versus multivessel intervention in 649 patients with AMI, CS, and MVD enrolled in the British Columbia Cardiac Registry. We evaluated mortality at 30 days and 1 year. RESULTS CVI was associated with lower mortality at 30 days (23.7% vs. 34.5%, P = 0.004) and 1 year (32.6% vs. 44.3%, P = 0.003). CVI was an independent predictor for survival at 30 days (HR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.45-0.88, P = 0.009) and 1 year (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.54-0.96, P = 0.027). These findings were confirmed in propensity-matched cohorts. Subgroup analyses indicated that CVI was associated with lower mortality in patients aged
Databáze: OpenAIRE