Two non-consecutive 24 h recalls using EPIC-Soft software are sufficiently valid for comparing protein and potassium intake between five European centres – results from the European Food Consumption Validation (EFCOVAL) study
| Autor: | Anouk Geelen, Willem De Keyzer, Marga C. Ocké, Evelien de Boer, Inge Huybrechts, Sandra Patricia Crispim, Jiri Ruprich, Inger Therese L. Lillegaard, Paul J.M. Hulshof, Pieter van 't Veer, Lionel Lafay, Lene Frost Andersen, Nadia Slimani, Jeanne H.M. de Vries, Olga W. Souverein, Anne-Sophie Rousseau, Marcela Dofkova |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2010 |
| Předmět: |
Potassium intake
Validation study Nutrition and Disease Food consumption Medicine (miscellaneous) Nutrient intake EPIC Diet Surveys Survey methodology biochemical markers Belgium Bias dietary-survey methodology Dietary monitoring Voeding en Ziekte adults Humans cancer Medicine Food science 24-hour urinary nitrogen Aged Czech Republic Netherlands VLAG Global Nutrition Wereldvoeding Nutrition and Dietetics Norway business.industry Potassium Dietary Reproducibility of Results biomarkers intake distributions composite foods Middle Aged Food Patterns nutrition Mental Recall Dietary Proteins France business Software energy Demography |
| Zdroj: | British Journal of Nutrition, 105(3), 447-458 British Journal of Nutrition 105 (2011) 3 |
| ISSN: | 1475-2662 0007-1145 |
| Popis: | The use of two non-consecutive 24 h recalls using EPIC-Soft for standardised dietary monitoring in European countries has previously been proposed in the European Food Consumption Survey Method consortium. Whether this methodology is sufficiently valid to assess nutrient intake in a comparable way, among populations with different food patterns in Europe, is the subject of study in the European Food Consumption Validation consortium. The objective of the study was to compare the validity of usual protein and K intake estimated from two non-consecutive standardised 24 h recalls using EPIC-Soft between five selected centres in Europe. A total of 600 adults, aged 45–65 years, were recruited in Belgium, the Czech Republic, France, The Netherlands and Norway. From each participant, two 24 h recalls and two 24 h urines were collected. The mean and distribution of usual protein and K intake, as well as the ranking of intake, were compared with protein and K excretions within and between centres. Underestimation of protein (range 2–13 %) and K (range 4–17 %) intake was seen in all centres, except in the Czech Republic. We found a fair agreement between prevalences estimated based on the intake and excretion data at the lower end of the usual intake distribution ( |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|