Inhibitory and facilitatory cueing effects: Competition between exogenous and endogenous mechanisms

Autor: Jason Satel, Vivian Eng, Caitlyn Osborne, Steve M. J. Janssen, A Lim
Rok vydání: 2019
Předmět:
PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Vision
Cognitive Neuroscience
media_common.quotation_subject
Endogeny
bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Cognition and Perception
Biology
Inhibitory postsynaptic potential
050105 experimental psychology
Competition (biology)
Article
Inhibition of return
03 medical and health sciences
bepress|Life Sciences|Neuroscience and Neurobiology
0302 clinical medicine
predictive cueing
0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
Behavioral inhibition
bepress|Life Sciences|Neuroscience and Neurobiology|Cognitive Neuroscience
lcsh:QH301-705.5
media_common
Cued speech
saccadic responses
PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception
05 social sciences
PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Attention
Cell Biology
inhibition of return
sensory adaptation
Sensory Systems
Saccadic masking
attention
bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Cognitive Psychology
Ophthalmology
PsyArXiv|Neuroscience|Cognitive Neuroscience
PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences
lcsh:Biology (General)
PsyArXiv|Neuroscience
Facilitation
bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences
PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology
dynamic neural field model
Neuroscience
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Optometry
Zdroj: Vision, Vol 3, Iss 3, p 40 (2019)
Vision
Volume 3
Issue 3
Popis: Inhibition of return is characterized by delayed responses to previously attended locations when the cue-target onset asynchrony (CTOA) is long enough. However, when cues are predictive of a target&rsquo
s location, faster reaction times to cued as compared to uncued targets are normally observed. In this series of experiments investigating saccadic reaction times, we manipulated the cue predictability to 25% (counterpredictive), 50% (nonpredictive), and 75% (predictive) to investigate the interaction between predictive endogenous facilitatory (FCEs) and inhibitory cueing effects (ICEs). Overall, larger ICEs were seen in the counterpredictive condition than in the nonpredictive condition, and no ICE was found in the predictive condition. Based on the hypothesized additivity of FCEs and ICEs, we reasoned that the null ICEs observed in the predictive condition are the result of two opposing mechanisms balancing each other out, and the large ICEs observed with counterpredictive cueing can be attributed to the combination of endogenous facilitation at uncued locations with inhibition at cued locations. Our findings suggest that the endogenous activity contributed by cue predictability can reduce the overall inhibition observed when the mechanisms occur at the same location, or enhance behavioral inhibition when the mechanisms occur at opposite locations.
Databáze: OpenAIRE