Inhibitory and facilitatory cueing effects: Competition between exogenous and endogenous mechanisms
Autor: | Jason Satel, Vivian Eng, Caitlyn Osborne, Steve M. J. Janssen, A Lim |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Vision
Cognitive Neuroscience media_common.quotation_subject Endogeny bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Cognition and Perception Biology Inhibitory postsynaptic potential 050105 experimental psychology Competition (biology) Article Inhibition of return 03 medical and health sciences bepress|Life Sciences|Neuroscience and Neurobiology 0302 clinical medicine predictive cueing 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Behavioral inhibition bepress|Life Sciences|Neuroscience and Neurobiology|Cognitive Neuroscience lcsh:QH301-705.5 media_common Cued speech saccadic responses PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception 05 social sciences PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Attention Cell Biology inhibition of return sensory adaptation Sensory Systems Saccadic masking attention bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Cognitive Psychology Ophthalmology PsyArXiv|Neuroscience|Cognitive Neuroscience PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences lcsh:Biology (General) PsyArXiv|Neuroscience Facilitation bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology dynamic neural field model Neuroscience 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Optometry |
Zdroj: | Vision, Vol 3, Iss 3, p 40 (2019) Vision Volume 3 Issue 3 |
Popis: | Inhibition of return is characterized by delayed responses to previously attended locations when the cue-target onset asynchrony (CTOA) is long enough. However, when cues are predictive of a target&rsquo s location, faster reaction times to cued as compared to uncued targets are normally observed. In this series of experiments investigating saccadic reaction times, we manipulated the cue predictability to 25% (counterpredictive), 50% (nonpredictive), and 75% (predictive) to investigate the interaction between predictive endogenous facilitatory (FCEs) and inhibitory cueing effects (ICEs). Overall, larger ICEs were seen in the counterpredictive condition than in the nonpredictive condition, and no ICE was found in the predictive condition. Based on the hypothesized additivity of FCEs and ICEs, we reasoned that the null ICEs observed in the predictive condition are the result of two opposing mechanisms balancing each other out, and the large ICEs observed with counterpredictive cueing can be attributed to the combination of endogenous facilitation at uncued locations with inhibition at cued locations. Our findings suggest that the endogenous activity contributed by cue predictability can reduce the overall inhibition observed when the mechanisms occur at the same location, or enhance behavioral inhibition when the mechanisms occur at opposite locations. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |