How Do Gender Differences in Quality of Care Vary Across Medicare Advantage Plans?
| Autor: | John L. Adams, Chloe E. Bird, Allen Fremont, Marc N. Elliott, Eric C. Schneider, Jacob W. Dembosky, David J. Klein, Sarah Gaillot, Amelia M. Haviland |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Male
Quality management media_common.quotation_subject Ethnic group 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology Medicare Advantage Health Services Accessibility 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Sex Factors Internal Medicine Medicine Humans Performance measurement Quality (business) 030212 general & internal medicine Healthcare Disparities Socioeconomic status media_common Original Research Quality Indicators Health Care Quality of Health Care business.industry Health services research Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set United States Women's Health Services Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C Female Health Services Research business Delivery of Health Care Demography |
| Popis: | BACKGROUND: Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) quality measures have long been used to compare care across health plans and to study racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities among Medicare Advantage (MA) beneficiaries. However, possible gender differences in seniors’ quality of care have received less attention. OBJECTIVE: To test for the presence and nature of any gender differences in quality of care across MA Plans, overall and by domain; to identify those most at risk of poor care. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of individual-level HEDIS measure scores from 23.8 million records using binomial mixed-effect models to estimate the effect of gender on performance. For each measure, we assess variation in gender gaps and their correlation with plan performance. PARTICIPANTS: Beneficiaries from 456 MA plans in 2011–2012 HEDIS data. MAIN MEASURES: Performance on 32 of 34 HEDIS measures which were available in both measurement years. The two excluded measures had mean performance scores below 10%. KEY RESULTS: Women experienced better quality of care than men for 22/32 measures, with most pertaining to screening or treatment. Men experienced better quality on nine measures, including four related to cardiovascular disease and three to potentially harmful drug-disease interactions. Plans varied substantially in the magnitude of gender gaps for 21/32 measures; in general, the gender gap in quality of care was least favorable to men in low-performing plans. CONCLUSIONS: Women generally experienced better quality of care than men. However, women experienced poorer care for cardiovascular disease-related intermediate outcomes and potentially harmful drug-disease interactions. Quality improvement may be especially important for men in low-performing plans and for cardiovascular-related care and drug-disease interactions for women. Gender-stratified reporting could reveal gender gaps, identify plans for which care varies by gender, and motivate efforts to address faults and close the gaps in the delivery system. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|