Reliability and Construct Validity of 3 Psychometric Trust Scales for Women Seeking Substance Abuse Treatment in a Community Setting
| Autor: | Susie Adams, Mary S. Dietrich, Deondria Matlock, Joshua D Cockroft |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Adolescent Psychometrics Substance-Related Disorders Population 030508 substance abuse Medicine (miscellaneous) Trust Young Adult 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Adverse Childhood Experiences medicine Humans 030212 general & internal medicine education Reliability (statistics) High rate Physician-Patient Relations education.field_of_study Adult Survivors of Child Abuse Sex Offenses Reproducibility of Results Construct validity Middle Aged Patient Acceptance of Health Care medicine.disease Emotional Abuse Community Mental Health Services Substance abuse Psychiatry and Mental health Physical Abuse Community setting Female 0305 other medical science Substance abuse treatment Psychology Clinical psychology |
| Zdroj: | Substance Abuse. 41:391-399 |
| ISSN: | 1547-0164 0889-7077 |
| Popis: | Background: Women with a history of substance use disorder (SUD) constitute a unique population with gender-specific needs in treatment. Most notable is high rates of prior trauma and the need for a trauma-informed care framework. Given theoretical links between trauma and interpersonal trust, understanding quantitatively how trust may impact outcomes for women in this population requires confirmation of validity of existing psychometric instruments. Objective: This study sought to confirm reliability and construct validity of the Rotter Interpersonal Trust Scale, Wake Forest Trust in Physician Scale, and the Revised Health Care System Distrust Scale (RHCSDS) for use in women with a history of SUD seeking treatment in a community-based setting. Methods: A total of 301 participants were enrolled between August 2017 and March 2018 at an urban, community-based residential substance abuse treatment program in the mid-South. Participants were given an electronic survey containing questions about demographics/clinical characteristics, the Rotter, Wake Forest, and RHCSDS scales, Socially Desirable Response Five-Item Survey (SDRS-5), and the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) questionnaire. All participants also completed a modified protocol of the “Trust Game.” Statistical analysis was completed for each trust scale in regard to scale means and distribution, internal consistency, interscale correlation, and scale correlation to the ACE score. Results: Results confirm statistically significant ( P .70 for all scales). Interscale correlation between individual scales is statistically significant, with the strongest relationship between the 2 health care–specific scales ( r = −.740, P Discussion: Findings suggest reliability and construct validity of scales for use in this population. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|