Testing of support tools for plagiarism detection
Autor: | Salim Razi, Jean Guerrero-Dib, Alla Anohina-Naumeca, Dita Dlabolová, Tomáš Foltýnek, Július Kravjar, Debora Weber-Wulff, Özgür İlhan Çelik, Laima Kamzola |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Yabancı Diller Yüksekokulu |
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
FOS: Computer and information sciences
Computer science ComputingMilieux_LEGALASPECTSOFCOMPUTING 02 engineering and technology Software testing Plagiarism Computer Science - Information Retrieval Education Task (project management) Software Usability testing 020204 information systems Similarity (psychology) H.3.7 0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering Digital Libraries (cs.DL) Plagiarism detection Text-matching software lcsh:LC8-6691 Information retrieval ComputingMilieux_THECOMPUTINGPROFESSION lcsh:Special aspects of education lcsh:T58.5-58.64 lcsh:Information technology business.industry 05 social sciences Educational technology 050301 education Information technology Computer Science - Digital Libraries Usability Computer Science Applications Test (assessment) business 0503 education Information Retrieval (cs.IR) Plagiarism detection tools |
Zdroj: | International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 1-31 (2020) |
ISSN: | 2365-9440 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s41239-020-00192-4 |
Popis: | Çelik, Özgür (Balikesir Author) There is a general belief that software must be able to easily do things that humans find difficult. Since finding sources for plagiarism in a text is not an easy task, there is a wide-spread expectation that it must be simple for software to determine if a text is plagiarized or not. Software cannot determine plagiarism, but it can work as a support tool for identifying some text similarity that may constitute plagiarism. But how well do the various systems work? This paper reports on a collaborative test of 15 web-based text-matching systems that can be used when plagiarism is suspected. It was conducted by researchers from seven countries using test material in eight different languages, evaluating the effectiveness of the systems on single-source and multi-source documents. A usability examination was also performed. The sobering results show that although some systems can indeed help identify some plagiarized content, they clearly do not find all plagiarism and at times also identify non-plagiarized material as problematic. HTW Berlin |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |