Simulation With PARTS (Phase-Augmented Research and Training Scenarios): A Structure Facilitating Research and Assessment in Simulation
Autor: | Carl Schick, Micha Dambach, Axel Knauth, Michaela Kolbe, Adrian Marty, Donat R. Spahn, Gudela Grote, Bastian Grande, Mona Weiss |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | University of Zurich, Schick, Carl J |
Rok vydání: | 2015 |
Předmět: |
Epidemiology
10216 Institute of Anesthesiology Medicine (miscellaneous) 610 Medicine & health Education Correlation 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine 030202 anesthesiology Statistics Humans Simulation Training Simulation Reliability (statistics) Mathematics Internship and Residency Reproducibility of Results 030208 emergency & critical care medicine 2701 Medicine (miscellaneous) Confidence interval Modeling and Simulation Clinical Competence Clinical competence Scenario design 2713 Epidemiology 3304 Education 2611 Modeling and Simulation |
Zdroj: | Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare |
ISSN: | 1559-713X |
Popis: | INTRODUCTION: Assessment in simulation is gaining importance, as are scenario design methods increasing opportunity for assessment. We present our approach to improving measurement in complex scenarios using PARTS [Phase-Augmented Research and Training Scenarios], essentially separating cases into clearly delineated phases. METHODS: We created 7 PARTS with real-time rating instruments and tested these in 63 cases during 4 weeks of simulation. Reliability was tested by comparing real-time rating with postsimulation video-based rating using the same instrument. Validity was tested by comparing preintervention and postintervention total results, by examining the difference in improvement when focusing on the phase-specific results addressed by the intervention, and further explored by trying to demonstrate the discrete improvement expected from proficiency in the rare occurrence of leader inclusive behavior. RESULTS: Intraclass correlations [3,1] between real-time and postsimulation ratings were 0.951 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.794-0.990), 1.00 (95% CI, --to--), 0.948 (95% CI, 0.783-0.989), and 0.995 (95% CI, 0.977-0.999) for 3 phase-specific scores and total scenario score, respectively. Paired t tests of prelecture-postlecture performance showed an improvement of 14.26% (bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap [BCa] 95% CI, 4.71-23.82; P = 0.009) for total performance but of 28.57% (BCa 95% CI, 13.84-43.30; P = 0.002) for performance in the respective phase. The correlation of total scenario performance with leader inclusiveness was not significant (rs = 0.228; BCa 95% CI. -0.082 to 0.520; P = 0.119) but significant for specific phase performance (rs = 0.392; BCa 95% CI, 0.118-0.632; P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The PARTS allowed for improved reliability and validity of measurements in complex scenarios. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |