Quiet PROPELLER MRI Techniques Match the Quality of Conventional PROPELLER Brain Imaging Techniques
| Autor: | D. Gui, Puneet Pawha, Amish H. Doshi, Lawrence Tanenbaum, Idoia Corcuera-Solano, A. Gaddipati |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2015 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male Scanner Sound Spectrography Image quality Acoustics Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery Sensitivity and Specificity Young Adult Nuclear magnetic resonance Neuroimaging otorhinolaryngologic diseases Humans Medicine Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Prospective Studies Child Sound pressure Aged Aged 80 and over Brain Diseases business.industry Propeller Brain Equipment Design Middle Aged Magnetic Resonance Imaging Hearing Loss Noise-Induced QUIET Female Neurology (clinical) business |
| Zdroj: | AJNR Am J Neuroradiol |
| ISSN: | 1936-959X 0195-6108 |
| Popis: | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Switching of magnetic field gradients is the primary source of acoustic noise in MR imaging. Sound pressure levels can run as high as 120 dB, capable of producing physical discomfort and at least temporary hearing loss, mandating hearing protection. New technology has made quieter techniques feasible, which range from as low as 80 dB to nearly silent. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the image quality of new commercially available quiet T2 and quiet FLAIR fast spin-echo PROPELLER acquisitions in comparison with equivalent conventional PROPELLER techniques in current day-to-day practice in imaging of the brain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four consecutive patients were prospectively scanned with quiet T2 and quiet T2 FLAIR PROPELLER, in addition to spatial resolution–matched conventional T2 and T2 FLAIR PROPELLER imaging sequences on a clinical 1.5T MR imaging scanner. Measurement of sound pressure levels and qualitative evaluation of relative image quality was performed. RESULTS: Quiet T2 and quiet T2 FLAIR were comparable in image quality with conventional acquisitions, with sound levels of approximately 75 dB, a reduction in average sound pressure levels of up to 28.5 dB, with no significant trade-offs aside from longer scan times. CONCLUSIONS: Quiet FSE provides equivalent image quality at comfortable sound pressure levels at the cost of slightly longer scan times. The significant reduction in potentially injurious noise is particularly important in vulnerable populations such as children, the elderly, and the debilitated. Quiet techniques should be considered in these special situations for routine use in clinical practice. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|