Multivariate analysis in the maximum strength performance
| Autor: | André Yui Aihara, Valmor Tricoli, E. O. de Souza, Anderson Caetano Paulo, Manoel Neves, Carlos Ugrinowitsch, Carla Silva-Batista, Gilberto Cândido Laurentino, Ronaldo Kobal Cardoso, A. V. N. Bacurau, Patricia Chakur Brum |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2012 |
| Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Multivariate analysis Muscle biopsy medicine.diagnostic_test Adolescent Vastus lateralis muscle Strength training Quadriceps muscle Physical Therapy Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation Exploratory analysis Athletic Performance Surgery Young Adult Statistics Multivariate Analysis medicine Humans Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Muscle Strength Muscle fibre Mathematics |
| Zdroj: | International journal of sports medicine. 33(12) |
| ISSN: | 1439-3964 |
| Popis: | This study performed an exploratory analysis of the anthropometrical and morphological muscle variables related to the one-repetition maximum (1RM) performance. In addition, the capacity of these variables to predict the force production was analyzed. 50 active males were submitted to the experimental procedures: vastus lateralis muscle biopsy, quadriceps magnetic resonance imaging, body mass assessment and 1RM test in the leg-press exercise. K-means cluster analysis was performed after obtaining the body mass, sum of the left and right quadriceps muscle cross-sectional area (∑CSA), percentage of the type II fibers and the 1RM performance. The number of clusters was defined a priori and then were labeled as high strength performance (HSP 1RM ) group and low strength performance (LSP 1RM ) group. Stepwise multiple regressions were performed by means of body mass, ∑CSA, percentage of the type II fibers and clusters as predictors’ variables and 1RM performance as response variable. The clusters mean±SD were: 292.8±52.1 kg, 84.7±17.9 kg, 19 249.7±1 645.5 mm 2 and 50.8±7.2% for the HSP 1RM and 254.0±51.1 kg, 69.2±8.1 kg, 15 483.1±1 104.8 mm 2 and 51.7±6.2%, for the LSP 1RM in the 1RM, body mass, ∑CSA and muscle fiber type II percentage, respectively. The most important variable in the clusters division was the ∑CSA. In addition, the ∑CSA and muscle fiber type II percentage explained the variance in the 1RM performance (Adj R 2 =0.35, p=0.0001) for all participants and for the LSP 1RM (Adj R 2 =0.25, p=0.002). For the HSP 1RM , only the ∑CSA was entered in the model and showed the highest capacity to explain the variance in the 1RM performance (Adj R 2 =0.38, p=0.01). As a conclusion, the muscle CSA was the most relevant variable to predict force production in individuals with no strength training background. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|