Updating the OMERACT Filter: Implications for Patient-reported Outcomes
| Autor: | M. Voshaar, Anne Lyddiatt, Wilma Smeets, Amye L. Leong, James W. May, T.K. Kvien, Pamela Montie, Maarten Boers, John R. Kirwan, Dorcas E. Beaton, Peter Tugwell, Susan J. Bartlett, Lyn March, Vibeke Strand, Ernest Choy, Ailsa Bosworth, Laure Gossec, Sarah Hewlett, Pam Richards, Peter Brooks, Francis Guillemin, Maarten de Wit, Robert Landewé, Enkeleida Nikaï |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Institute for Work and Health (IWH), University of Toronto-St. Michael's Hospital-Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center [Amsterdam], National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society (NRAS), Institut Jacques Monod (IJM (UMR_7592)), Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), EULAR standing committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Ecole de Santé Publique [Nancy], Faculté de Médecine [Nancy], Université de Lorraine (UL)-Université de Lorraine (UL), Maladies chroniques, santé perçue, et processus d'adaptation (APEMAC), Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 (UPD5)-Université de Lorraine (UL), Université Sorbonne Paris Cité (USPC), Dpt of Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology [Amsterdam], Amsterdam and Atrium Medical Center, Institute of Bone & Joint Research, Royal North Shore Hospital (RNSH)-The University of Sydney, Stanford School of Medicine [Stanford], Stanford Medicine, Stanford University-Stanford University, University of Ottawa [Ottawa], Hôpital Cochin [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP), Stanford University School of Medicine [Stanford], Stanford University [Stanford], University of Ottawa [Ottawa] (uOttawa), CHU Cochin [AP-HP], Institute for Work and Health ( IWH ), University Medical Center, National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society ( NRAS ), Institut Jacques Monod ( IJM ), Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 ( UPD7 ) -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ), Université de Lorraine ( UL ) -Université de Lorraine ( UL ), Maladies chroniques, santé perçue, et processus d'adaptation. Approches épidémiologiques et psychologiques. ( APEMAC - EA 4360 ), Université de Lorraine ( UL ) -Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 ( UPD5 ), Université Sorbonne Paris Cité ( USPC ), Royal North Shore Hospital ( RNSH ) -The University of Sydney [Sydney], Amsterdam institute for Infection and Immunity, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Epidemiology and Data Science, Rheumatology, CCA - Innovative therapy |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2014 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
MESH: Self Report International studies Immunology Alternative medicine MESH : Rheumatic Diseases MESH : Self Report MESH : Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Outcome (game theory) Filter (software) Session (web analytics) MESH: Patient Participation law.invention MESH: Rheumatic Diseases Randomized controlled trial Rheumatology law Rheumatic Diseases MESH: Rheumatology MESH : Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) Immunology and Allergy Medicine Humans Good practice MESH : Rheumatology OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS Medical education MESH: Humans business.industry MESH : Reproducibility of Results MESH : Humans Reproducibility of Results [ SDV.SPEE ] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie MESH : Patient Participation MESH: Reproducibility of Results Outcome and Process Assessment Health Care MESH: Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES [SDV.SPEE]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie Self Report Patient Participation business Working group MESH: Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Rheumatology Journal of Rheumatology, Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Company Limited, 2014, 41 (5), pp.1011-1015. ⟨10.3899/jrheum.131312⟩ Journal of Rheumatology, Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Company Limited, 2014, 41 (5), pp.1011-1015. 〈10.3899/jrheum.131312〉 Journal of rheumatology, 41(5), 1011-1015. Journal of Rheumatology Kirwan, J R, Bartlett, S J, Beaton, D E, Boers, M, Bosworth, A, Brooks, P M, Choy, E, de Wit, M P T, Guillemin, F, Hewlett, S, Kvien, T K, Landewe, R B, Leong, A L, Lyddiatt, A, March, L, May, J, Montie, P L, Nikai, E, Richards, P, Voshaar, M M J H, Smeets, W, Strand, V, Tugwell, P & Gossec, L 2014, ' Updating the OMERACT Filter: Implications for Patient-reported Outcomes ', Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1011-1015 . https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.131312 Journal of Rheumatology, 41(5), 1011-1015. Journal of Rheumatology |
| ISSN: | 0315-162X 1499-2752 |
| DOI: | 10.3899/jrheum.131312⟩ |
| Popis: | Objective.At a previous Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) meeting, participants reflected on the underlying methods of patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument development. The participants requested proposals for more explicit instrument development protocols that would contribute to an enhanced version of the “Truth” statement in the OMERACT Filter, a widely used guide for outcome validation. In the present OMERACT session, we explored to what extent these new Filter 2.0 proposals were practicable, feasible, and already being applied.Methods.Following overview presentations, discussion groups critically reviewed the extent to which case studies of current OMERACT Working Groups complied with or negated the proposed PRO development framework, whether these observations had a more general application, and what issues remained to be resolved.Results.Several aspects of PRO development were recognized as particularly important, and the need to directly involve patients at every stage of an iterative PRO development program was endorsed. This included recognition that patients contribute as partners in the research and not merely as subjects. Correct communication of concepts with the words used in questionnaires was central to their performance as measuring instruments, and ensuring this understanding crossed cultural and linguistic boundaries was important in international studies or comparisons.Conclusion.Participants recognized, endorsed, and were generally already putting into practice the principles of PRO development presented in the plenary session. Further work is needed on some existing instruments and on establishing widespread good practice for working in close collaboration with patients. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|