Aims and harvest of moral case deliberation
Autor: | Froukje Weidema, Bert Molewijk, Frans Kamsteeg, Guy Widdershoven |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Ethics, Law & Medical humanities, EMGO - Quality of care |
Rok vydání: | 2013 |
Předmět: |
Interprofessional Relations
media_common.quotation_subject Identity (social science) Nursing Staff Hospital Morals Nurse's Role Ethics Nursing Health care Humans Cooperative Behavior Empowerment Nursing Process Naturalism Quality of Health Care media_common Moral disengagement Practice Patterns Nurses' Ethical issues business.industry Focus Groups Public relations Deliberation Issues ethics and legal aspects Ethics Consultation Clinical Ethics business Psychology Social psychology |
Zdroj: | Weidema, F C, Molewijk, A C, Kamsteeg, F & Widdershoven, G A M 2013, ' Aims and harvest of moral case deliberation ', Nursing Ethics, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 617-631 . https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733012473773 Nursing Ethics, 20(6), 617-631. SAGE Publications Ltd |
ISSN: | 1477-0989 0969-7330 |
DOI: | 10.1177/0969733012473773 |
Popis: | Deliberative ways of dealing with ethical issues in health care are expanding. Moral case deliberation is an example, providing group-wise, structured reflection on dilemmas from practice. Although moral case deliberation is well described in literature, aims and results of moral case deliberation sessions are unknown. This research shows (a) why managers introduce moral case deliberation and (b) what moral case deliberation participants experience as moral case deliberation results. A responsive evaluation was conducted, explicating moral case deliberation experiences by analysing aims (N = 78) and harvest (N = 255). A naturalistic data collection included interviews with managers and evaluation questionnaires of moral case deliberation participants (nurses). From the analysis, moral case deliberation appeals for cooperation, team bonding, critical attitude towards routines and nurses’ empowerment. Differences are that managers aim to foster identity of the nursing profession, whereas nurses emphasize learning processes and understanding perspectives. We conclude that moral case deliberation influences team cooperation that cannot be controlled with traditional management tools, but requires time and dialogue. Exchanging aims and harvest between manager and team could result in co-creating (moral) practice in which improvements for daily cooperation result from bringing together perspectives of managers and team members. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |