Evaluation of PET quantitation accuracy among multiple discovery IQ PET/CT systems via NEMA image quality test

Autor: Elena De Ponti, Delphine Vallot, Sabrina Morzenti, Jorge Uribe, Olivier Caselles, Chiranjib Dutta, Paul Deak, Anna Pieczonka, Gabriel Reynés Llompart, Jakub Siennicki, Anna Gramek
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
Zdroj: Dipòsit Digital de la UB
Universidad de Barcelona
EJNMMI Physics
EJNMMI Physics, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2020)
ISSN: 2197-7364
DOI: 10.1186/s40658-020-00294-y
Popis: Introduction Quantitative imaging biomarkers are becoming usual in oncology for assessing therapy response. The harmonization of image quantitation reporting has become of utmost importance due to the multi-center trials increase. The NEMA image quality test is often considered for the evaluation of quantitation and is more accurate with a radioactive solid phantom that reduces variability. The goal of this project is to determine the level of variability among imaging centers if acquisition and imaging protocol parameters are left to the center’s preference while all other parameters are fixed including the scanner type. Methods A NEMA-IQ phantom filled with radioactive 68Ge solid resin was imaged in five clinical sites throughout Europe. Sites reconstructed data with OSEM and BSREM algorithms applying the sites’ clinical parameters. Images were analyzed according with the NEMA-NU2-2012 standard using the manufacturer-provided NEMA tools to calculate contrast recovery (CR) and background variability (BV) for each sphere and the lung error (LE) estimation. In addition, a 18F-filled NEMA-IQ phantom was also evaluated to obtain a gauge for variability among centers when the sites were provided with identical specific instructions for acquisition and reconstruction protocol (the aggregate of data from 12 additional sites is presented). Results The data using the 68Ge solid phantom showed no statistical differences among different sites, proving a very good reproducibility among the PET center models even if dispersion of data is higher with OSEM compared to BSREM. Furthermore, BSREM shows better CR and comparable BV, while LE is slightly reduced. Two centers exhibit significant differences in CR and BV values for the 18F NEMA NU2-2012 experiments; these outlier results are explained. Conclusion The same PET system type from the various sites produced similar quantitative results, despite allowing each site to choose their clinical protocols with no restriction on data acquisition and reconstruction parameters. BSREM leads to lower dispersion of quantitative data among different sites. A solid radioactive phantom may be recommended to qualify the sites to perform quantitative imaging.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: