Differences in TIMI frame count following successful reperfusion with stenting or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction
| Autor: | Paul S Phillips, Paul S. Teirstein, David L. Brown, Erminia M. Guarneri, Martin E Edep |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 1999 |
| Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty medicine.medical_treatment Myocardial Infarction Reperfusion therapy Internal medicine Angioplasty medicine Humans cardiovascular diseases Myocardial infarction Angioplasty Balloon Coronary Aged Retrospective Studies business.industry Blood flow Thrombolysis Middle Aged medicine.disease Coronary Vessels Treatment Outcome surgical procedures operative medicine.anatomical_structure Regional Blood Flow Cardiology Female Stents Radiology Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business TIMI Artery |
| Zdroj: | The American Journal of Cardiology. 83:1326-1329 |
| ISSN: | 0002-9149 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00094-6 |
| Popis: | The Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade achieved in the infarct-related artery (IRA) during reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is directly related to myocardial salvage. Recently, several series have demonstrated the safety of stenting in AMI and documented a larger postprocedure luminal diameter than that found at angioplasty, although no study has compared the effect of PTCA and stenting in AMI on flow characteristics of the IRA. The residual stenosis and the number of frames required to opacify standardized angiographic landmarks normalized for vessel length (corrected TIMI frame count) or compared with flow in a corresponding normal coronary artery (TIMI frame count index) were determined for the IRA of 39 patients who underwent angioplasty or stenting for AMI. Baseline characteristics were similar for the 20 patients who underwent stenting and the 19 patients who underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. After intervention, the luminal diameter was greater (3.24 vs 2.09 mm, p |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect