Gingival abrasion and recession in manual and oscillating-rotating power brush users
| Autor: | Ralf Adam, Julie Grender, E Van der Sluijs, N.A.M. Rosema, G.A. van der Weijden, S.C. Supranoto |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Parodontologie (OII, ACTA), Periodontology |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2014 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male Toothbrushing Time Factors Adolescent Gingival and periodontal pocket Cross-sectional study Dental Plaque Gingiva Dentistry Dental plaque law.invention plaque Young Adult Gingivitis gingival abrasion law medicine Humans Periodontal Pocket Single-Blind Method Dentistry (miscellaneous) Coloring Agents Gingival recession business.industry Dental Plaque Index Original Articles Equipment Design medicine.disease gingival recession Cross-Sectional Studies Population study Female Periodontal Index Toothbrush medicine.symptom business |
| Zdroj: | Rosema, N A M, Adam, R, Grender, J M, van der Sluijs, E, Supranoto, S C & van der Weijden, G A 2014, ' Gingival abrasion and recession in manual and oscillating-rotating power brush users ', International Journal of Dental Hygiene, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 257-266 . https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.12085 International Journal of Dental Hygiene International Journal of Dental Hygiene, 12(4), 257-266. Wiley-Blackwell |
| ISSN: | 1601-5029 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/idh.12085 |
| Popis: | ObjectiveTo assess gingival recession (GR) in manual and power toothbrush users and evaluate the relationship between GR and gingival abrasion scores (GA).MethodsThis was an observational (cross-sectional), single-centre, examiner-blind study involving a single-brushing exercise, with 181 young adult participants: 90 manual brush users and 91 oscillating-rotating power brush users. Participants were assessed for GR and GA as primary response variables. Secondary response variables were the level of gingival inflammation, plaque score reduction and brushing duration. Pearson correlation was used to describe the relationship between number of recession sites and number of abrasions. Prebrushing (baseline) and post-brushing GA and plaque scores were assessed and differences analysed using paired tests. Two-sample t-test was used to analyse group differences; ancova was used for analyses of post-brushing changes with baseline as covariate.ResultsOverall, 97.8% of the study population had at least one site of ≥1 mm of gingival recession. For the manual group, this percentage was 98.9%, and for the power group, this percentage was 96.7% (P = 0.621). Post-brushing, the power group showed a significantly smaller GA increase than the manual group (P = 0.004); however, there was no significant correlation between number of recession sites and number of abrasions for either group (P ≥ 0.327).ConclusionsLittle gingival recession was observed in either toothbrush user group; the observed GR levels were comparable. Lower post-brushing gingival abrasion levels were seen in the power group. There was no correlation between gingival abrasion as a result of brushing and the observed gingival recession following use of either toothbrush. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text