The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on infertility patients and endometriosis patients in the Netherlands

Autor: Velja Mijatovic, José Knijnenburg, Laura L. van Loendersloot, Madelon van Wely, A M F Schreurs, Inge M. Custers, Mariëtte Goddijn, J. W. M. Maas, Annemiek W. Nap, Cornelis B. Lambalk, Jasmijn Bergwerff, Kimmy Rosielle, Bianca De Bie
Přispěvatelé: Center for Reproductive Medicine, APH - Methodology, APH - Personalized Medicine, ARD - Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, APH - Quality of Care, Obstetrie & Gynaecologie, RS: GROW - R4 - Reproductive and Perinatal Medicine
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2021
Předmět:
Zdroj: Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 43, 4, pp. 747-755
Reproductive biomedicine online, 43(4), 747-755. Elsevier
Reproductive Biomedicine
Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 43, 747-755
Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 43(4), 747-755. ELSEVIER SCI LTD
ISSN: 1472-6483
Popis: Contains fulltext : 244716.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) RESEARCH QUESTION: How do infertility patients, endometriosis patients and health-care providers rate virtual care as an alternative to physical consultations during the first lockdown of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in the Netherlands, and how does this influence quality of life and quality of care? DESIGN: Infertility patients and endometriosis patients from a university hospital and members of national patient organizations, as well as healthcare providers in infertility and endometriosis care, were asked to participate between May and October 2020. The distributed online questionnaires consisted of an appraisal of virtual care and an assessment of fertility-related quality of life (FertiQol) and patient-centredness of endometriosis care (ENDOCARE). RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned by 330 infertility patients, 181 endometriosis patients and 101 healthcare providers. Of these, 75.9% of infertility patients, 64.8% of endometriosis patients and 80% of healthcare providers rated telephone consultations as a good alternative to physical consultations during the COVID-19-pandemic. Only 21.3%, 14.8% and 19.2% of the three groups rated telephone consultations as a good replacement for physical consultations in the future. A total of 76.6% and 35.9% of the infertility and endometriosis patients reported increased levels of stress during the pandemic. Infertility patients scored lower on the FertiQol, while the ENDOCARE results care seem comparable to the reference population. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual care seems to be a good alternative for infertility and endometriosis patients in circumstances where physical consultations are not possible. Self-reported stress is especially high in infertility patients during the COVID-19-pandemic. Healthcare providers should aim to improve their patients' ability to cope.
Databáze: OpenAIRE