Impact of a personalised, digital, HIV self-testing app-based program on linkages and new infections in the township populations of South Africa

Autor: Nicolaos Karatzas, Marietjie Pretorius, Paramita Saha Chaudhuri, Mohammed Fadul, Jana Daher, Anna de Waal, Alice Zwerling, Gayatri Marathe, Aliasgar Esmail, Keertan Dheda, Suzette Oelofse, Nora Engel, Megan Smallwood, Nitika Pai
Přispěvatelé: RS: CAPHRI - R4 - Health Inequities and Societal Participation, Metamedica
Rok vydání: 2021
Předmět:
Zdroj: BMJ Global Health
University of Cape Town
BMJ Global Health, Vol 6, Iss 9 (2021)
BMJ Global Health, 6(9):e006032. BMJ Publishing Group
ISSN: 2059-7908
DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006032
Popis: Introduction Implementation data for digital unsupervised HIV self-testing (HIVST) are sparse. We evaluated the impact of an app-based, personalised, oral HIVST program offered by healthcare workers in Western Cape, South Africa. Methods In a quasirandomised study (n=3095), we recruited consenting adults with undiagnosed HIV infection from township clinics. To the HIVST arm participants (n=1535), we offered a choice of an offsite (home, office or kiosk based), unsupervised digital HIVST program (n=962), or an onsite, clinic-based, supervised digital HIVST program (n=573) with 24/7 linkages services. With propensity score analyses, we compared outcomes (ie, linkages, new HIV infections and test referrals) with conventional HIV testing (ConvHT) arm participants (n=1560), recruited randomly from geographically separated clinics. Results In both arms, participants were young (HIVST vs ConvHT) (mean age: 28.2 years vs 29.2 years), female (65.0% vs 76.0%) and had monthly income Participants chose unsupervised HIVST (62.7%) versus supervised HIVST and reported multiple sex partners (10.88% vs 8.7%), exposure to sex workers (1.4% vs 0.2%) and fewer comorbidities (0.9% vs 1.9%). Almost all HIVST participants were linked (unsupervised HIVST (99.7%), supervised HIVST (99.8%) vs ConvHT (98.5%)) (adj RR 1.012; 95% CI 1.005 to 1.018) with new HIV infections: overall HIVST (9%); supervised HIVST (10.9%) and unsupervised HIVST (7.6%) versus ConvHT (6.79%) (adj RR 1.305; 95% CI 1.023 to 1.665); test referrals: 16.7% HIVST versus 3.1% ConvHT (adj RR 5.435; 95% CI 4.024 to 7.340). Conclusions Our flexible, personalised, app-based HIVST program, offered by healthcare workers, successfully linked almost all HIV self-testers, detected new infections and increased referrals to self-test. Data are relevant for digital HIVST initiatives worldwide.
Databáze: OpenAIRE