Cervical length varies considering different populations and gestational outcomes: Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis
Autor: | Ben W.J. Mol, Michele Franca, José Guilherme Cecatti, Thaís V Silva, Anderson Borovac-Pinheiro, Rodolfo C. Pacagnella, Renato Passini, Thaísa Guedes Bortoletto, J. P. Argenton, A. R. Hatanaka, A. D. Silva, Cynara Maria Pereira |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Epidemiology
Maternal Health Cervix Uteri Cervix Diagnostic Radiology Database and Informatics Methods Mathematical and Statistical Techniques Pregnancy Risk Factors Ultrasound Imaging Medicine and Health Sciences Medicine Cutoff Database Searching education.field_of_study Multidisciplinary Obstetrics Radiology and Imaging Statistics Obstetrics and Gynecology Metaanalysis Research Assessment Cervical Length Measurement medicine.anatomical_structure Systematic review Meta-analysis Physical Sciences Premature Birth Female Anatomy Genital Anatomy Research Article medicine.medical_specialty Asia Systematic Reviews Imaging Techniques Science Population Gestational Age Preterm Birth Research and Analysis Methods Diagnostic Medicine Humans Statistical Methods Risk factor education business.industry Infant Newborn Reproductive System Biology and Life Sciences medicine.disease Pregnancy Complications Medical Risk Factors Africa Birth Women's Health business Mathematics |
Zdroj: | PLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 2, p e0245746 (2021) PLoS ONE |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 |
Popis: | Background The uterine cervical length is an important risk factor for preterm birth. The aim of this study was to assess cervical length distribution in women with singleton pregnancies, measured by transvaginal ultrasound between 16 and 24 weeks, and its association with population characteristics. Materials and methods We searched electronic databases and other sources for studies published from April 1, 1990 to July 21, 2020. Of the 2019 retrieved publications, full-text versions of 137 articles were considered. We included 77 original articles that reported cervical length measurements of 363,431 women. The main aim of this study was to identify the pattern of cervical length in different populations. We collected demographic and clinical data concerning the population, in addition to information regarding the ultrasound examination and cervical length measurement. Regarding study bias, 56 were at low risk of bias and 21 were at medium risk of bias. Results The meta-analysis included 57 articles with data from 158,346 women. The mean cervical length was 37.96. mm (95% CI [36.68, 39.24]). Cervical length was shorter in women from Africa and Asia, in those from low-income countries, with a lower body weight, and in those who delivered before 37 gestational weeks. We found that the cervical length from pooled studies is longer than that usually discussed in the literature. Regarding limitations, we had difficulty assessing our main variable because there was no consistent pattern in the way authors reported cervical length measurement. Another limitation was the great heterogeneity between studies. Conclusions The use of a single cutoff value to define a short cervix diagnosis, an important risk factor for preterm birth, may not be correct and cervical length must be considered according to maternal population characteristics. Future studies should identify different specific curves and cutoff values for cervical length in different populations. This meta-analysis was registered in the PROSPERO database under CRD42017070246 at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=70246. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |